Grigg A, Lusk J, Szer J
Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Leuk Lymphoma. 1995 Jul;18(3-4):329-34. doi: 10.3109/10428199509059626.
Granulocyte transfusions may be beneficial in neutropenic patients with progressive infections despite appropriate antibiotics. In order to evaluate both the feasibility of granulocyte collection in normal donors receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the efficacy of infusing these cells into neutropenic patients with progressive sepsis, four donors received between 5-10 micrograms/kg G-CSF per day and underwent leucapheresis within a day of the first dose. Different red cell sedimenting agents and interface settings were evaluated to determine the optimal method of granulocyte collection. The number of granulocytes collected, the peripheral blood granulocyte level in the recipient at various time points after infusion, and the clinical response were evaluated. Results showed that G-CSF and the leucaphereses caused mild to moderate fatigue in two donors and profound fatigue and a brief episode of hypoxia in one donor. Efficient granulocyte collections were only obtained using dextran 40 or dextran 70 as the sedimenting agent and a deep interface setting which extended sampling into the upper red cell layer. Infusion of granulocytes obtained with this technique resulted in a sustained increase in circulating granulocyte numbers in three recipients, one of whom gained significant clinical benefit. In conclusion, granulocyte transfusions from donors given G-CSF are feasible and may be clinically beneficial, particularly if given early in the course of infection in neutropenic patients.
对于尽管使用了适当抗生素但仍有进行性感染的中性粒细胞减少患者,粒细胞输注可能有益。为了评估在接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的正常供者中采集粒细胞的可行性,以及将这些细胞输注到患有进行性败血症的中性粒细胞减少患者中的疗效,四名供者每天接受5-10微克/千克的G-CSF,并在首剂后的一天内进行白细胞单采。评估了不同的红细胞沉降剂和界面设置,以确定粒细胞采集的最佳方法。对采集的粒细胞数量、输注后不同时间点受体的外周血粒细胞水平以及临床反应进行了评估。结果显示,G-CSF和白细胞单采在两名供者中引起了轻度至中度疲劳,在一名供者中引起了严重疲劳和短暂的缺氧发作。仅使用右旋糖酐40或右旋糖酐70作为沉降剂以及将采样扩展到上层红细胞层的深界面设置才能有效采集粒细胞。用该技术获得的粒细胞输注导致三名受体循环粒细胞数量持续增加,其中一名受体获得了显著的临床益处。总之,来自接受G-CSF的供者的粒细胞输注是可行的,并且可能在临床上有益,特别是在中性粒细胞减少患者感染过程早期给予时。