Hilsted J C, Evald T, Elbrønd R, Olesen G, Larsen A L, Andersen B, Sales Y M, Gjørup T
Department of Acute Admissions, Hvidovre Hospital.
Dan Med Bull. 1995 Sep;42(4):371-3.
To compare hospitalization into medical departments, acute admissions into a city hospital and into a district hospital were compared prospectively over a two-week period. Patients referred to the city hospital were on average older, were more frequently living alone and they had a greater amount of social care attendance in their homes. On the other hand, distribution of referral diagnoses, overall patient activity, occupational status and contact with relatives were similar in the two areas. Sub-acute or acute illness was considered the main cause of admission in both areas; the amount of admissions for social reasons was 13 percent to the city hospital versus 3 percent to the district hospital. Relevant alternatives to hospitalization seemed to exist in 50 percent of the admissions to the city hospital versus only 3 percent to the district hospital. Since patients admitted for social reasons block hospital beds for a longer time period than those admitted for other reasons, these differences may to some extent explain why length of hospital stay is longer in city hospitals than in rural ones.
为比较各医学科室的住院情况,在两周时间内对一家城市医院和一家区医院的急性入院患者进行了前瞻性比较。转诊至城市医院的患者平均年龄更大,独居的频率更高,且家中接受社会护理的次数更多。另一方面,两个地区转诊诊断的分布、患者的总体活动情况、职业状况以及与亲属的联系情况相似。亚急性或急性疾病被认为是两个地区入院的主要原因;因社会原因入院的比例在城市医院为13%,在区医院为3%。在城市医院,50%的入院患者似乎存在住院的相关替代方案,而在区医院这一比例仅为3%。由于因社会原因入院的患者比因其他原因入院的患者占用医院床位的时间更长,这些差异可能在一定程度上解释了为什么城市医院的住院时间比农村医院更长。