Suppr超能文献

氨苄西林/舒巴坦与单纯氨苄西林用于剖宫产预防:一项随机双盲试验。

Ampicillin/sulbactam versus ampicillin alone for cesarean section prophylaxis: a randomized double-blind trial.

作者信息

Rijhsinghani A, Savopoulos S E, Walters J K, Huggins G, Hibbs J R

机构信息

Francis Scott Key Medical Center, Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 1995 Sep;12(5):322-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994485.

Abstract

To study the effectiveness of anaerobic coverage in prevention of postpartum endometritis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean sections, we conducted a randomized prospective double-blind study of women undergoing cesarean sections and requiring antibiotic prophylaxis from April 1, 1989, through December 31, 1990. Ninety-four patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-five patients received ampicillin alone and 46 received ampicillin in conjunction with sulbactam. All patients were evaluated prior to surgery and in the postoperative period. Ninety-one patients completed the study and their records were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of ruptured membranes. Seventy-five percent of patients had ruptured membranes. Failure of prophylaxis and subsequent endometritis was documented in 8.8% of patients who received ampicillin and sulbactam and 35.3% of patients who received ampicillin alone. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.02). In conclusion, single-dose ampicillin and sulbactam provides better prophylaxis than single-dose ampicillin in women undergoing cesarean section with rupture of membranes.

摘要

为研究非选择性剖宫产妇女中厌氧菌覆盖预防产后子宫内膜炎的有效性,我们于1989年4月1日至1990年12月31日对行剖宫产且需要抗生素预防的妇女进行了一项随机前瞻性双盲研究。94例患者纳入研究。45例患者仅接受氨苄西林,46例患者接受氨苄西林联合舒巴坦。所有患者在手术前和术后均接受评估。91例患者完成研究并对其记录进行分析。根据胎膜是否破裂将患者分为两组。75%的患者胎膜破裂。接受氨苄西林联合舒巴坦的患者中8.8%预防失败并随后发生子宫内膜炎,仅接受氨苄西林的患者中这一比例为35.3%。这一差异具有统计学意义(p<0.02)。总之,对于胎膜破裂的剖宫产妇女,单剂量氨苄西林联合舒巴坦比单剂量氨苄西林提供更好的预防效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验