Schweigmann N J, Pietrokovsky S, Conti O, Bottazzi V, Canale D, Wisnivesky-Colli C
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995 May-Jun;90(3):429-31. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761995000300022.
This paper compares the predation pressure that ducks and chickens exert on triatomines. For the tests, these birds were placed in individual boxes together with a known number of Triatoma infestans and left to interact from 6 p.m. till the next morning, involving a long lasting period of complete darkness limited by two short-term periods of semi-darkness. There was a shelter which could prevent the bugs from being predated. The number of live and dead triatomines was recorded, considering missing bugs as predated by the birds. Ducks exhibited a greater predatory activity than chickens, that could be due to a long term active period at night while chickens sleep motionless from sunset to dawn. Surviving triatomines that had fed on chickens outnumbered those fed on ducks suggesting that these were less accessible to the triatomine biting. If ducks are better than chickens to detect and eat bugs and to interfere with their feeding in the field, an increase in duck number might help to diminish triatomine density. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility of application of these experimental results.
本文比较了鸭和鸡对锥蝽的捕食压力。在测试中,将这些鸟类与已知数量的侵扰锥猎蝽放置在单独的盒子中,从下午6点到第二天早上让它们进行互动,其中包括一段长时间的完全黑暗期,由两个短期的半黑暗期限定。有一个庇护所可以防止虫子被捕食。记录存活和死亡的锥蝽数量,将失踪的虫子视为被鸟类捕食。鸭表现出比鸡更大的捕食活动,这可能是由于鸭在夜间有较长的活跃期,而鸡从日落到黎明一动不动地睡觉。以鸡为食的存活锥蝽数量超过以鸭为食的锥蝽数量,这表明鸭对锥蝽叮咬的易感性较低。如果鸭在野外比鸡更善于发现和捕食虫子并干扰它们进食,增加鸭的数量可能有助于降低锥蝽密度。需要进一步研究以确定应用这些实验结果的可行性。