Rohrbaugh J W, Syndulko K, Lindsley D B
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Apr;46(4):416-27. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90143-3.
Using a simple stimulus counting task, negative after-waves following single (unpaired) stimuli were investigated under a variety of stimulus conditions. Responses were obtained to tones at 3 intensities, to light flashes at 3 intensities, and to tones at 3 rates of presentation. The acoustic stimuli led to a negative after-wave that peaked at frontal sites around 500 or 600 msec, and then trailed off to a more central scalp representation. This negative after-wave was increased in amplitude by slowing the rate of stimulus presentation. In comparison, no appreciable or sustained after-wave was elicited by visual stimuli. No significant effects in the negative after-wave were associated with intensity, either for visual or for acoustic stimuli. When analyzed by Principal Components Analysis, the negative after-waves were shown to comprise in all cases two underlying factors, although the factors contributed less to the total wave form for visual stimuli than for acoustic stimuli. Two interpretations for the negative after-wave were contrasted, one considering it to be an integral feature of the auditory evoked potential. A second interpretation, more compatible with the data obtained here, links the negative after-wave with non-specific activation processes.
使用一个简单的刺激计数任务,在各种刺激条件下研究了单个(未配对)刺激后的负后波。记录了对3种强度的音调、3种强度的闪光以及3种呈现速率的音调的反应。听觉刺激引发了一个负后波,该负后波在额部区域约500或600毫秒时达到峰值,然后逐渐衰减为更集中的头皮表征。通过减慢刺激呈现速率,该负后波的振幅增加。相比之下,视觉刺激未引发明显或持续的后波。对于视觉或听觉刺激,负后波中均未发现与强度相关的显著影响。通过主成分分析进行分析时,结果表明负后波在所有情况下均由两个潜在因素组成,尽管与听觉刺激相比,这些因素对视觉刺激的总波形贡献较小。对负后波的两种解释进行了对比,一种解释认为它是听觉诱发电位的一个组成特征。第二种解释与这里获得的数据更相符,它将负后波与非特异性激活过程联系起来。