Sun Y, Wang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Yao Y
Department of Urology, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing.
Chin Med J (Engl). 1995 Oct;108(10):769-73.
The use of two urethral stents woven from titanium nickel alloy (TiNi) in the form of a tubular mesh or a spiral stent (both made in China) is described. They were implanted in 62 patients with prostatic outflow obstruction. All patients were considered contraindicated for surgery. They were divided into a spiral stent group (group 1) treated between March 1992 and May 1993, comprising 35 cases, and a tubular mesh group (group 2) treated between October 1993 and December 1994, comprising 31 cases, including four failures in group 1. Thirty-three out of the 35 patients in group 1 were treated successfully. Good results were achieved in eight cases (22.8%) and significant improvements occurred in 24 (68.5%), giving a total effective rate of 91.3%, with a follow-up of 11 to 27 months. Fourteen stents were removed within 6 months after the insertion and six more were removed within 12 months. The mean effective time of the stent in situ was 10.8 months. All 31 cases in the mesh group were treated successfully. Dramatically good effects were obtained in 28 cases (over 90%) and distinct improvements were achieved in two, giving a total effective rate of over 96.5%, with a follow-up of 6 to 14 months (mean 10.5 months). Cystoscopy was carried out in 12 patients after 6 months following the insertion. The major part of the meshes became covered by urothelium. Compared with the spiral, the mesh makes it possible to insert a prosthesis with a larger diameter and anti-pressure. The spiral, however, can be used as a temporary alternative for the relief of prostatic obstruction. A tubular mesh can work well for the relief of prostatic obstruction and remain in situ without causing major problems for at least 1 year.
本文描述了两种由钛镍合金(TiNi)编织而成的尿道支架,一种呈管状网状,另一种为螺旋状支架(均为中国制造)。这两种支架被植入62例前列腺流出道梗阻患者体内。所有患者均被认为不适合手术治疗。患者被分为螺旋支架组(第1组),于1992年3月至1993年5月接受治疗,共35例;管状网状支架组(第2组),于1993年10月至1994年12月接受治疗,共31例,其中第1组有4例治疗失败。第1组35例患者中33例治疗成功。8例(22.8%)效果良好,24例(68.5%)有显著改善,总有效率为91.3%,随访时间为11至27个月。14个支架在植入后6个月内取出,另外6个在12个月内取出。支架在位的平均有效时间为10.8个月。网状支架组的31例患者均治疗成功。28例(超过90%)效果极佳,2例有明显改善,总有效率超过96.5%,随访时间为6至14个月(平均10.5个月)。12例患者在植入后6个月进行了膀胱镜检查。网状结构的大部分被尿路上皮覆盖。与螺旋状支架相比,网状支架能够植入直径更大且抗压的假体。然而,螺旋状支架可作为缓解前列腺梗阻的临时替代方案。管状网状支架在缓解前列腺梗阻方面效果良好,且至少能在原位留存1年而不引发重大问题。