Filicori M, Flamigni C, Cognigni G E, Falbo A, Arnone R, Capelli M, Pavani A, Mandini M, Calderoni P, Brondelli L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Fertil Steril. 1996 Feb;65(2):387-93.
To clarify the endocrine mechanisms underlying the outcome of different ovulation induction regimens with gonadotropins and GnRH agonists (GnRH-a).
Prospective study.
Reproductive Endocrinology Center, University of Bologna.
Forty eumenorrheic women randomly assigned to four groups of 10 subjects each.
Ovulation induction regimens: group A, purified FSH only; group B, purified FSH and flare-up GnRH-a; group C, purified FSH and long GnRH-a; and group D, hMG and long GnRH-a.
Pelvic ultrasound and hormone levels in daily serum samples and in follicular fluid drawn immediately before hCG administration.
Exogenous gonadotropin dose did not differ among groups. Group B had fewer preovulatory follicles than group C. Group B had higher serum LH, FSH, E2, P, T, and follicular fluid LH, E2, T, and alpha-inhibin than groups C and/or D. Groups C and D did not differ.
Long GnRH-a regimens improved follicle yield and the endocrine milieu in spite of comparable exogenous gonadotropin dose and lower serum FSH and thus appear to be preferable in assisted reproduction. Reduced folliculogenesis found in flare-up GnRH-a regimens could be mediated by the atretic effects of high intraovarian androgens. Efficacy of purified FSH and hMG was comparable.
阐明使用促性腺激素和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)的不同促排卵方案结局背后的内分泌机制。
前瞻性研究。
博洛尼亚大学生殖内分泌中心。
40名月经周期正常的女性,随机分为四组,每组10名受试者。
促排卵方案:A组,仅使用纯化FSH;B组,纯化FSH和激发剂量的GnRH-a;C组,纯化FSH和长效GnRH-a;D组,人绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)和长效GnRH-a。
盆腔超声检查以及在注射hCG前即刻采集的每日血清样本和卵泡液中的激素水平。
各组间外源性促性腺激素剂量无差异。B组排卵前卵泡数量少于C组。B组血清LH、FSH、E2、P、T水平以及卵泡液LH、E2、T和α-抑制素水平高于C组和/或D组。C组和D组无差异。
尽管外源性促性腺激素剂量相当且血清FSH水平较低,但长效GnRH-a方案仍可提高卵泡产量并改善内分泌环境,因此在辅助生殖中似乎更可取。激发剂量GnRH-a方案中卵泡生成减少可能由卵巢内高雄激素的闭锁作用介导。纯化FSH和hMG的疗效相当。