Clayden G S
Med Educ. 1977 Mar;11(2):119-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1977.tb00573.x.
Five surveys on the performance of candidates in the paediatric option of MCRP(UK) Part II examination show the paediatric candidates to be at a disadvantage in the written part. The paediatric candidate is later in his career to obtain his MRCP (UK), as the mean interval from qualification to success at Part II is 41-7 months compared with 34 months for non-paediatric candidates (P = 0-0026). Lower marks were scored by paediatric candidates in the written section on the whole (P = 0-055), slide identification (P = 0-015), data interpretation (P = 0-065) and non-paediatric case histories P = 0-023) as seen in those candidates who passed each part at first attempt, the discrepancy being wider in those having more attempts to pass. In the oral examination the paediatric candidate scored higher (P = 0-07) but no significant difference in the clinical marks. Although it appears that few paediatricians have been severely penalized by the present system, it does require the paediatric candidate to orientate his preparation for Part II towards his books rather than towards his clinical practice, which is contrary to the aim of the Part II examination of the MRCP(UK). Plans have been announced by the Presidents of the three Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom for an entirely paediatric Part II.
关于英国皇家内科医师资格考试(MRCP)第二部分儿科选项中考生表现的五项调查显示,儿科考生在笔试部分处于劣势。儿科考生获得MRCP(UK)的时间较晚,因为从获得资格到通过第二部分考试的平均间隔时间为41.7个月,而非儿科考生为34个月(P = 0.0026)。总体而言,儿科考生在笔试部分(P = 0.055)、幻灯片识别(P = 0.015)、数据解读(P = 0.065)和非儿科病例史(P = 0.023)方面的得分较低,这在首次通过各部分考试的考生中可见一斑,在多次尝试通过的考生中差异更为明显。在口试中,儿科考生得分较高(P = 0.07),但临床分数无显著差异。尽管目前似乎很少有儿科医生受到该系统的严重惩罚,但它确实要求儿科考生将第二部分考试的准备方向转向书本而非临床实践,这与MRCP(UK)第二部分考试的目的背道而驰。英国三家皇家内科医学院的院长已宣布计划推出完全针对儿科的第二部分考试。