Suppr超能文献

使用双特异性抗体(抗CD3×抗独特型)以及CD28诱导的共刺激对BCL1淋巴瘤进行的体内研究。

In vivo studies using bispecific antibodies (anti-CD3 x anti-idiotype) and CD28-induced costimulation in the BCL1 lymphoma.

作者信息

Demanet C, Brissinck J, De Jonge J, Thielemans K

机构信息

Division of Physiology, Medical School, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Belgium.

出版信息

J Hematother. 1995 Oct;4(5):363-8. doi: 10.1089/scd.1.1995.4.363.

Abstract

We previously reported the successful treatment of the BCL1 lymphoma in Balb/c mice using bispecific (anti-CD3 x anti-idiotype) antibodies (BsAb). The in vivo effect was dependent on the bridging of tumor cells and CD3-positive cells. This direct CD3/TCR cross-linking induced targeted cytolytic and cytotoxic activity toward the tumor cells. Definitive proof of an underlying T cell-mediated mechanism was obtained, as the therapeutic effect was completely lost when animals were T cell depleted before treatment. In all these experiments, animals were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 5000 tumor cells (day 0) and treated with one single intravenous (i.v.) injection of 5 micrograms BsAb (day 9). At a higher tumor load, the therapy lost its effectiveness. We evaluated repeated injections of bispecific antibodies (BsAb) to treat mice with a higher tumor burden (10(5) tumor cells). However, a dose-related immunosuppression (even with 5 micrograms BsAb) was induced. Therefore, this approach was only beneficial if the immune system could recover from the previous injection of BsAb. To prevent this induction of anergy, costimulation with bivalent anti-CD28 has been proposed, but despite the high in vitro T cell proliferation using BsAb + anti-CD28 versus BsAb alone, we were repeatedly unsuccessful in improving our in vivo results using immunologically naive animals. Only when T cell preactivation was induced was a significantly better outcome observed when the animals were treated with a mixture of BsAb + anti-CD28 compared with BsAb or anti-CD28 alone. The potency of the BsAb + anti-CD28 combination was demonstrated by the fact that 10 times less BsAb was necessary to cure animals with a 20 times higher tumor burden.

摘要

我们之前报道了使用双特异性(抗CD3×抗独特型)抗体(BsAb)成功治疗Balb/c小鼠的BCL1淋巴瘤。体内效应依赖于肿瘤细胞与CD3阳性细胞的桥接。这种直接的CD3/TCR交联诱导了针对肿瘤细胞的靶向溶细胞和细胞毒性活性。由于在治疗前使动物T细胞耗竭时治疗效果完全丧失,从而获得了潜在的T细胞介导机制的确切证据。在所有这些实验中,于第0天经腹腔(i.p.)给动物注射5000个肿瘤细胞,并于第9天经静脉(i.v.)单次注射5微克BsAb进行治疗。在更高的肿瘤负荷下,该疗法失去了有效性。我们评估了重复注射双特异性抗体(BsAb)以治疗具有更高肿瘤负荷(10⁵个肿瘤细胞)的小鼠。然而,诱导了剂量相关的免疫抑制(即使使用5微克BsAb)。因此,仅当免疫系统能够从上一次注射BsAb中恢复时,这种方法才有益。为了防止这种无反应性的诱导,有人提出用二价抗CD28进行共刺激,但是尽管与单独使用BsAb相比,使用BsAb +抗CD28在体外T细胞增殖率很高,但我们反复未能使用免疫未成熟动物改善我们的体内实验结果。只有当诱导T细胞预激活时,与单独使用BsAb或抗CD28相比,用BsAb +抗CD28混合物治疗动物时才观察到明显更好的结果。BsAb +抗CD28组合的效力体现在治愈肿瘤负荷高20倍的动物所需的BsAb量减少了10倍这一事实上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验