Suppr超能文献

右心室心尖部与流出道程序性心室刺激结果的比较:一项随机、前瞻性研究。

Comparison of the results of programmed ventricular stimulation from the right ventricular apex and outflow tract: a randomized, prospective study.

作者信息

Martínez-Rubio A, Stachowitz A, Borggrefe M, Reinhardt L, Cabrera-Santos A, Chen X, Willems S, Shenasa M, Breithardt G

机构信息

Hospital of the Westfälische Wilhelms University of Münster, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1995 Sep;16(9):1234-43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061081.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the yield of programmed ventricular stimulation at the right ventricular apex compared with the outflow tract.

METHODS

A stepwise randomized cross-over protocol of programmed ventricular stimulation with alternating stimulation at both sites was used in 66 patients who were studied because of sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 30), ventricular fibrillation (n = 7), or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and/or syncope (n = 29).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the results of stimulation from either right ventricular site with regard to the presence or absence of structural heart disease, spontaneous arrhythmia, ejection fraction or effective refractory periods. Overall, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was inducible in 33 patients (50%); in 25 patients (75.8%), this arrhythmia was induced from both sites. However, in only 17 of these 25 patients (68%) did the induced monomorphic ventricular tachycardias have the same morphologies and similar (+/- 50 ms) cycle lengths. Ventricular fibrillation was inducible in 11 patients (17%), mostly by three extrastimuli (n = 8; 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) stimulation from at least two right ventricular sites is desirable because of their independent contribution to the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, (2) the non-inducibility or inducibility at one ventricular site does not predict the effect at another stimulation site, (3) the effective refractory period at the right ventricular apex and outflow tract do not differ, (4) the inducibility of multiple ventricular tachycardia morphologies emphasizes the importance of documenting the cause of spontaneous arrhythmias with multiple electrocardiographic leads to ensure the correct interpretation of arrhythmias induced by programmed stimulation, (5) clinical or haemodynamic features cannot predict whether one or more stimulation sites will be required for induction of ventricular tachycardia. These results are important for the diagnostic evaluation and assessment of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性研究旨在分析与右心室流出道相比,在右心室心尖部进行程控心室刺激的成功率。

方法

对66例因持续性室性心动过速(n = 30)、心室颤动(n = 7)或非持续性室性心动过速和/或晕厥(n = 29)而接受研究的患者,采用逐步随机交叉方案进行程控心室刺激,在两个部位交替刺激。

结果

在有无结构性心脏病、自发性心律失常、射血分数或有效不应期方面,两个右心室部位的刺激结果无显著差异。总体而言,33例患者(50%)可诱发出单形性室性心动过速;其中25例患者(75.8%)在两个部位均可诱发出这种心律失常。然而,在这25例患者中,只有17例(68%)诱发出的单形性室性心动过速具有相同的形态和相似(±50毫秒)的周期长度。11例患者(17%)可诱发出心室颤动,多数通过三个期前刺激(n = 8;73%)诱发。

结论

(1)由于至少两个右心室部位对室性快速心律失常的诱发有独立作用,因此需要在这些部位进行刺激;(2)一个心室部位的不可诱发性或可诱发性不能预测另一个刺激部位的效果;(3)右心室心尖部和流出道的有效不应期无差异;(4)多种室性心动过速形态的可诱发性强调了用多个心电图导联记录自发性心律失常病因以确保正确解释程控刺激诱发的心律失常的重要性;(5)临床或血流动力学特征无法预测诱发室性心动过速需要一个还是多个刺激部位。这些结果对诊断评估以及药物或非药物干预的评估具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验