Hoffmann R M, Paterok B, Müller T, Becker-Carus C
Psychologischen Institut II, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Deutschland.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1995;145(17-18):478-80.
The following study presents results of a broad diagnostical screening for 128 insomniacs, which includes polysomnography, sleep-wake diaries and psychosometrical testing. It was our special aim to investigate about critical but not classical variables for insomnia, which had been mentioned in sleep literature before. We therefore focused on hypotheses about the meaning of state 1 sleep (according to Zorick et al. 1984) and the number of REM-Non-REM Cycles (according to Rüther et al. 1985) for the diagnosis of insomnia. Statistical analysis (t-Test, p = 0.05) showed that patients with less than 3 REM-Non-REM Cycles consumed significantly more hypnotics during 6 months before the sleep examination. Moreover it was obvious (Chi-Square, p = 0.001) that more than 50% of insomniacs with organic causes presented less than 3 cycles, whereas the latter was true only for 1 patient with primary insomnia. Although results were not as strong for the "state-1 sleep variable", we find that these non-classical sleep variables should be sincerely regarded within the future context of the diagnosis of insomnia.
以下研究展示了对128名失眠症患者进行广泛诊断筛查的结果,其中包括多导睡眠图、睡眠-清醒日记和心理测试。我们的特别目的是研究睡眠文献中曾提及的、针对失眠症的关键但非经典变量。因此,我们重点关注了关于1期睡眠(根据佐里克等人1984年的研究)的意义以及快速眼动-非快速眼动周期数量(根据吕特等人1985年的研究)对失眠症诊断的假设。统计分析(t检验,p = 0.05)表明,快速眼动-非快速眼动周期少于3个的患者在睡眠检查前6个月服用的催眠药显著更多。此外,很明显(卡方检验,p = 0.001),超过50%的有器质性病因的失眠症患者周期少于3个,而原发性失眠患者中只有1例是这种情况。尽管“1期睡眠变量”的结果没有那么显著,但我们发现,在未来失眠症诊断的背景下,这些非经典睡眠变量应得到认真考虑。