Suppr超能文献

[颅脑创伤患者的镇痛与镇静]

[Analgesia and sedation in patients with head-brain trauma].

作者信息

Gremmelt A, Braun U

机构信息

Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1995 Dec;44 Suppl 3:S559-65.

PMID:8592967
Abstract

The goal of therapy in patients with severe head injury is to avoid secondary brain damage. Analgesia and sedation are an essential part of the therapy, and several drugs are in current use. However, few controlled clinical trials have been performed so far, and none of these drugs has proved to be superior. Although in the past the therapy has been focused on controlling elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), many authors emphasize the role of cerebral ischaemia in the prognosis of patients. Therefore, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) i.e. the difference between ICP and mean arterial pressure (CPP = MAP-ICP), seems to be more important than ICP alone. Analgesics and sedatives reduce the cerebral metabolic rate (CMR), and the consequent decrease in cerebral oxygen uptake might prevent ischaemic damage in regions with low perfusion. Moreover, a decrease in CMR is often associated with a decrease of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in regions with normal perfusion and, as a result, ICP is also reduced. Basically, the cerebral effects (on ICP, CMR, and CBF) and the haemodynamic effects with respect to maintenance of a sufficient CPP are most important in the selection of drugs for analgosedation. In addition, the effects on general intensive care management must be considered (pulmonary function, immunreactivity bowel motility). The purpose of this paper is to describe drugs commonly used for analgosedation in severe head injury. Barbiturates bring about the most pronounced decrease of CMR and ICP. In the past these drugs were used routinely in high doses ("barbiturate coma"). However, no improvement in outcome was demonstrable, and vitally dangerous side effects, such as infection, pulmonary dysfunction, arterial hypotension, and renal failure often occurred. High-dose barbiturate therapy is therefore only indicated in exceptional cases, such as refractory increase in ICP with preserved CO2 response of cerebral vessels. The effect is dependent on CMR at the start of this therapy. Benzodiazepines are frequently used in patients with head injury. They cause only a moderate decrease of CMR and ICP. In general, side effects are negligible. However, a possible decrease of MAP by reduced central sympathetic drive has to be taken into account. Opioids are also frequently used in patients with head trauma. The observed cerebral effects are inconsistent. Some authors have described increases in ICP, CBF, and CMR, but in most studies no influence on these values, or a decrease, has been observed. In any case, cautious titration of these drugs and cerebral monitoring are therefore desirable. As with benzodiazepines, a decrease in MAP due to central effects is possible. In addition, opioids inhibit bowel motility. Ketamine is generally used because of its favourable circulatory effects, bronchodilatation and absence of inhibition of bowel motility. In patients with increased ICP, however, it is often considered contraindicated, since it can be associated with cerebral vasodilation and ICP increase. Other studies did not confirm an increase of ICP when controlled ventilation and additional sedation were applied. More recent studies have demonstrated the role of neuroexcitatory NMDA-receptors in ischaemic and traumatic brain damage. Since ketamine exerts an antagonistic effect on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDA) and studies in animals have demonstrated a protective effect of ketamine against ischaemic and traumatic brain damage, controlled clinical studies in patients with head injury are desirable. Propofol results in a profound decrease of CMR and a significant decrease of ICP, but often also in haemodynamic depression. Few results obtained during long-term administration are available, but it seems to be beneficial. More clinical studies are warranted. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a physiological substance, which has only sporadically been investigated for sedation in patients with head trauma. The few available studies show beneficial res

摘要

重度颅脑损伤患者的治疗目标是避免继发性脑损伤。镇痛和镇静是治疗的重要组成部分,目前有多种药物可供使用。然而,迄今为止几乎没有进行过对照临床试验,而且这些药物均未被证明具有优越性。尽管过去治疗重点在于控制颅内压(ICP)升高,但许多作者强调脑缺血在患者预后中的作用。因此,脑灌注压(CPP),即ICP与平均动脉压之间的差值(CPP = MAP - ICP),似乎比单纯的ICP更为重要。镇痛药和镇静药可降低脑代谢率(CMR),随之脑氧摄取量的减少可能会预防低灌注区域的缺血性损伤。此外,CMR降低通常与正常灌注区域的脑血流量(CBF)减少相关,结果ICP也会降低。基本上,在选择镇痛镇静药物时,药物对脑的影响(对ICP、CMR和CBF)以及对维持足够CPP的血流动力学影响最为重要。此外,还必须考虑对一般重症监护管理的影响(肺功能、免疫反应、肠道蠕动)。本文旨在描述重度颅脑损伤中常用的镇痛镇静药物。巴比妥类药物可使CMR和ICP显著降低。过去这些药物常大剂量常规使用(“巴比妥类昏迷”)。然而,并未显示出对预后有改善,且常出现危及生命的副作用,如感染、肺功能障碍、动脉低血压和肾衰竭。因此,大剂量巴比妥类药物治疗仅在特殊情况下使用,如ICP顽固性升高且脑血管对二氧化碳有反应。其效果取决于治疗开始时的CMR。苯二氮䓬类药物常用于颅脑损伤患者。它们只会使CMR和ICP适度降低。一般来说,副作用可忽略不计。然而,必须考虑到由于中枢交感神经驱动力降低可能导致的MAP下降。阿片类药物也常用于颅脑外伤患者。观察到的脑效应并不一致。一些作者描述了ICP、CBF和CMR升高,但在大多数研究中未观察到对这些值有影响,或观察到降低。无论如何,因此需要谨慎滴定这些药物并进行脑监测。与苯二氮䓬类药物一样,由于中枢效应可能导致MAP下降。此外,阿片类药物会抑制肠道蠕动。氯胺酮通常因其有利的循环效应、支气管扩张作用以及不抑制肠道蠕动而被使用。然而,在ICP升高的患者中,它常被视为禁忌,因为它可能与脑血管扩张和ICP升高有关。其他研究未证实在进行控制通气和额外镇静时ICP会升高。最近的研究表明神经兴奋性N - 甲基 - D - 天冬氨酸受体(NMDA)在缺血性和创伤性脑损伤中的作用。由于氯胺酮对N - 甲基 - D - 天冬氨酸受体(NMDA)具有拮抗作用,且动物研究已证明氯胺酮对缺血性和创伤性脑损伤有保护作用,因此需要对颅脑损伤患者进行对照临床研究。丙泊酚可使CMR显著降低,ICP明显降低,但通常也会导致血流动力学抑制。长期给药期间获得的结果很少,但似乎有益。需要更多的临床研究。γ - 羟基丁酸(GHB)是一种生理物质,仅偶尔对颅脑外伤患者的镇静作用进行过研究。少数现有研究显示有益的……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验