Sheahan R G, Klein G J, Yee R, Le Feuvre C A, Krahn A D
Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):969-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.969.
Some patients with otherwise typical AV node reentry do not manifest discontinuous AV node function curves. We examined the effects of an ablation in the slow-pathway region in patients with smooth AV node function curves.
Fifteen patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and discontinuous AV node function curves were compared with 15 patients with AVNRT and smooth AV node function curves. In the group with discontinuous curve, the "net" anterograde effective refractory period (AERP) of the AV node increased (270 +/- 28 versus 304 +/- 37 ms, P = .03) and AERP of the remaining fast pathway decreased (367 +/- 100 versus 304 +/- 37 ms, P = .026) after the ablation. In the group with a smooth curve, the AERP of the AV node increased (266 +/- 42 versus 299 +/- 76 ms, P = .07) and the anterograde Wenckebach cycle length increased (336 +/- 66 versus 379 +/- 86 ms, P = .008) after the ablation. Retrograde conduction over the AV node was similar in both groups and was unchanged after ablation. The longest attainable AH interval (AHmax) measured during atrial extrastimulus testing was more prolonged in patients with a discontinuous curve than in patients with a smooth curve (326 +/- 48 versus 250 +/- 70 ms, P = .002). The AHmax shortened in both groups after ablation (326 +/- 48 versus 173 +/- 34 ms, P < .0001, and 250 +/- 70 versus 179 +/ 34 ms, P < .0003, respectively) and were similar. Successful ablation in the slow-pathway zone in patients with a smooth AV node function curve resulted in the loss of the "tail" of the curve representing the slow pathway.
These data suggest that the smooth AV node function curve consists of two distinct components representing both fast and slow AV node pathways even when the typical discontinuity is absent.
一些具有典型房室结折返的患者并未表现出不连续的房室结功能曲线。我们研究了在房室结功能曲线平滑的患者中,慢径区域消融的效果。
将15例房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)且房室结功能曲线不连续的患者与15例AVNRT且房室结功能曲线平滑的患者进行比较。在曲线不连续组,消融后房室结的“净”前传有效不应期(AERP)增加(270±28对304±37毫秒,P = 0.03),剩余快径的AERP降低(367±100对304±37毫秒,P = 0.026)。在曲线平滑组,消融后房室结的AERP增加(266±42对299±76毫秒,P = 0.07),前传文氏周期长度增加(336±66对379±86毫秒,P = 0.008)。两组房室结的逆向传导相似,消融后无变化。心房期外刺激试验中测得的最长AH间期(AHmax),曲线不连续的患者比曲线平滑的患者延长更明显(326±48对250±70毫秒,P = 0.002)。两组消融后AHmax均缩短(分别为326±48对173±34毫秒,P < 0.0001,以及250±70对179±34毫秒,P < 0.0003)且相似。房室结功能曲线平滑的患者在慢径区成功消融导致代表慢径的曲线“尾部”消失。
这些数据表明,即使没有典型的不连续性,平滑的房室结功能曲线也由代表快、慢房室结径路的两个不同成分组成。