Buatti J M, Marcus R B, Mendenhall W M, Friedman W A, Bova F J
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0385, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Mar 1;34(4):785-92. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02157-4.
To evaluate accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant gliomas.
Between April 1985 and June 1994, 70 adult patients with pathologically confirmed malignant glioma (75% glioblastoma multiforme, 25% anaplastic astrocytoma) suitable for high-dose therapy were selected for treatment with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy, 1.5 Gy twice daily to a total target dose of 60 Gy. Two patients were excluded from analysis (one patient had a fatal pulmonary embolism after 18 Gy; one patient discontinued therapy after 28.5 Gy against medical advice and without sequelae or progression). The 68 patients in the study group had a median age of 52 years and a median Karnofsky performance status of 90. Stereotactic implant (125I) or stereotactic radiosurgery boosts were delivered to 16 patients (24%) in the study group. Minimum follow-up was 6 months.
Median survival was 13.8 months and median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. The absolute Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 16% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. Multivariate analysis for the prognostic impact of age, gender, histology, Karnofsky performance status, symptomatology, surgical resection vs. biopsy, and boost vs. nonboost therapy revealed that Karnofsky performance status > or = 90, boost therapy, and surgical excision predicted significantly improved outcome. No severe toxicity occurred in patients treated with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy alone, although 5% required steroids temporarily for edema. Progression occurred during treatment in one patient (1.5%).
This regimen of accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and leads to results comparable with those of standard therapy. The rate of disease progression during treatment is significantly better (p = 0.001) than is reported for patients treated with standard fractionation, with or without chemotherapy. This regimen is a reasonable starting point for future trials and may have some advantages over standard fractionation.
评估加速超分割放射治疗恶性胶质瘤的效果。
1985年4月至1994年6月期间,选择70例经病理证实适合高剂量治疗的成年恶性胶质瘤患者(75%为多形性胶质母细胞瘤,25%为间变性星形细胞瘤)接受加速超分割放射治疗,每日两次,每次1.5 Gy,总靶剂量60 Gy。两名患者被排除在分析之外(一名患者在接受18 Gy照射后发生致命性肺栓塞;一名患者在接受28.5 Gy照射后违反医嘱中断治疗,无后遗症或病情进展)。研究组的68例患者中位年龄为52岁,中位卡氏评分90分。16例(24%)研究组患者接受了立体定向植入(125I)或立体定向放射外科强化治疗。最短随访时间为6个月。
中位生存期为13.8个月,中位无进展生存期为7.4个月。绝对Kaplan-Meier生存率在2年时为16%,在5年时为4%。对年龄、性别、组织学、卡氏评分、症状、手术切除与活检以及强化治疗与非强化治疗的预后影响进行多因素分析显示,卡氏评分≥90分、强化治疗和手术切除可显著改善预后。单独接受加速超分割放射治疗的患者未出现严重毒性反应,尽管5%的患者因水肿需要临时使用类固醇。一名患者(1.5%)在治疗期间出现病情进展。
这种加速超分割放射治疗方案耐受性良好,效果与标准治疗相当。治疗期间疾病进展率明显优于(p = 0.001)接受标准分割治疗(无论是否联合化疗)的患者。该方案是未来试验的合理起点,可能比标准分割有一些优势。