Suppr超能文献

7,12-二甲基苯并[a]蒽和12-O-十四烷酰佛波醇-13-乙酸酯诱导小鼠皮肤肿瘤的剂量-时间反应。

Dose-time response in mouse skin tumor induction by 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene and 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate.

作者信息

Lutz W K, Beland P E, Candrian R, Fekete T, Fischer W H

机构信息

Department of Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Feb;23(1 Pt 1):44-8. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0007.

Abstract

The question was addressed whether the dose-response relationship derived from a carcinogenicity study can be used for mechanistic interpretation and to what extent the shape of the curve is dependent on the duration of the bioassay and the time of analysis. The mouse skin tumor model was used. It allows recording of the time of tumor appearance without interim sacrifice. Groups of 16 female NMRI mice were treated twice weekly by dermal administration with combinations of (a) 2.5 nmol 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) plus 0, 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 nmol 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) or with (b) 2.5 nmol DMBA plus 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 nmol TPA. The appearance of the first papilloma was recorded for each animal and the cumulative incidence data were analyzed in two ways: (i) With the usual dose-prevalence representation at a fixed time point, the dose response for TPA was sigmoidal, while it was linear-superlinear for DMBA. This was observed at all time points, indicating that the dose-response information may be used for a distinction between DNA-reactive and tumor-promoting mechanisms of action. (ii) When time-to-tumor and loss of tumor-free lifetime was analyzed as a function of dose, there was again a marked difference between DMBA and TPA. The tumor-free lifetime increased with each step of dose reduction but the slope was about four times larger for TPA compared with that for DMBA. Further reduction of the TPA dose could result in a situation in which the natural life span sets a limit to an observable effect. Under the conditions of this bioassay for mouse skin papilloma induction by a combination treatment with DMBA plus TPA, the findings support the idea of a no-effect low-dose threshold for the tumor-promoting agent.

摘要

研究探讨了致癌性研究得出的剂量反应关系是否可用于机制解释,以及曲线形状在多大程度上取决于生物测定的持续时间和分析时间。使用了小鼠皮肤肿瘤模型。该模型能够记录肿瘤出现的时间,无需进行中期处死。将16只雌性NMRI小鼠分为几组,每周两次经皮给予以下组合药物:(a) 2.5 nmol 12-O-十四烷酰佛波醇-13-乙酸酯(TPA)加0、0.3、1、3或10 nmol 7,12-二甲基苯并[a]蒽(DMBA),或(b) 2.5 nmol DMBA加0、0.1、0.3、1、3或10 nmol TPA。记录每只动物首次出现乳头瘤的情况,并以两种方式分析累积发病率数据:(i) 在固定时间点采用常规的剂量-患病率表示法,TPA的剂量反应呈S形,而DMBA的剂量反应呈线性-超线性。在所有时间点均观察到这种情况,表明剂量反应信息可用于区分DNA反应性和肿瘤促进作用机制。(ii) 当将肿瘤出现时间和无瘤生存期的损失作为剂量的函数进行分析时,DMBA和TPA之间再次存在明显差异。随着剂量降低的每一步,无瘤生存期都会增加,但TPA的斜率约为DMBA的四倍。进一步降低TPA剂量可能会导致自然寿命对可观察到的效应产生限制的情况。在该生物测定条件下,通过DMBA加TPA联合处理诱导小鼠皮肤乳头瘤,研究结果支持肿瘤促进剂存在无效应低剂量阈值的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验