Suppr超能文献

对于患有压力性尿失禁的女性,是否应该用纤维蛋白胶阴道固定术取代伯奇阴道悬带术?

Should Burch colposuspension be replaced by fibrin glue colpofixation in women with urinary stress incontinence?

作者信息

Jolic V

机构信息

General Hospital Slovenj Gradec, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia.

出版信息

Zentralbl Gynakol. 1996;118(4):236-8.

PMID:8651013
Abstract

There are lots of articles recently concerning a very successful fibrin glue colpofixation used in treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) instead of sutures according to Burch colposuspension [6, 5, 4]. Being in doubt about each modification of the original Burch surgery method, in spite of reported good results, I have decided to explain my own opinion concerning this problem. According to recent knowledge of the lower urinary tract anatomy, described by DeLancey and S. Raz [3, 11], supporting factors of the vesical neck as a part of the continence mechanism in women is more understandable.

摘要

最近有很多文章涉及一种非常成功的纤维蛋白胶阴道固定术,该方法用于治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI),而不是根据Burch阴道悬吊术使用缝线[6,5,4]。尽管报道的结果良好,但对于原始Burch手术方法的每一种改进我都心存疑虑,因此我决定就这个问题阐述一下自己的观点。根据DeLancey和S. Raz[3,11]所描述的关于下尿路解剖结构的最新知识,膀胱颈作为女性控尿机制一部分的支撑因素更容易理解了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验