Ringdén O, Labopin M, Tura S, Arcese W, Iriondo A, Zittoun R, Sierra J, Gorin N C
Department of Clinical Immunology and Transplantation Surgery, Huddinge Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Br J Haematol. 1996 Jun;93(3):637-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1681.x.
We retrospectively compared the outcome in patients in the EBMT database transplanted for acute leukaemia from January 1987 to January 1994 who received busulphan and cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) as a pretransplant regimen versus those who received cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation (CY/TBI). The patients were matched for type of transplant (autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) versus allogeneic (BMT)), diagnosis (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)), status (early (first complete remission, CR-1) versus intermediate (second or later remission, first relapse)), age, FAB classification for AML, prevention of graft-versus-host disease and year of transplantation. In ABMT recipients (matched paired 530 x 2) with ALL CR-1, AML CR-1 and AML intermediate disease, transplant-related mortalities (TRM) relapse incidence (RI) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) did not differ significantly in patients treated with BU/CY or CY/TBI. However, in ABMT recipients with ALL intermediate disease, the probability of relapse was 82 +/- 5% (+/- 95% confidence interval) in the BU/CY group compared to 62 +/- 6% in the CY/TBI group (P = 0.002) and the 2-year leukaemia-free survival 14 +/- 4% and 34 +/- 6%, respectively (P = 0.002). In BMT recipients of bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings (matched paired 391 x 2), the TRM, RI and LFS did not differ significantly between the two treatments in all groups. In particular, the 2-year LFS in patients with AML CR-1 was 64 +/- 3% in those treated with BU/CY (n = 237) compared to 66 +/- 3% in those given CY/TBI (n = 237). In all groups the findings were confirmed in a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver (P < 0.05) and haemorrhagic cystitis (P < 0.001) was more common in the BU/CY group compared to the CY/TBI group for ABMT and BMT patients. In conclusion, BU/CY and CY/TBI as pretransplant regimens gave similar results in all situations, except ABMT for ALL intermediate stages with more than 2 years from diagnosis to transplantation, where a lower RI and a higher LFS were associated with CY/TBI.
我们回顾性比较了1987年1月至1994年1月在欧洲血液与骨髓移植协会(EBMT)数据库中因急性白血病接受移植的患者的预后情况,这些患者移植前的预处理方案分别为白消安和环磷酰胺(BU/CY)以及环磷酰胺和全身照射(CY/TBI)。对患者的移植类型(自体骨髓移植(ABMT)与同种异体移植(BMT))、诊断(急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)或急性髓细胞白血病(AML))、状态(早期(首次完全缓解,CR-1)与中期(第二次或更晚缓解、首次复发))、年龄、AML的FAB分型、移植物抗宿主病的预防措施以及移植年份进行了匹配。在ABMT受者(配对530×2)中,对于ALL CR-1、AML CR-1和AML中期疾病患者,接受BU/CY或CY/TBI治疗的患者在移植相关死亡率(TRM)、复发率(RI)和无白血病生存率(LFS)方面无显著差异。然而,在ALL中期疾病的ABMT受者中,BU/CY组的复发概率为82±5%(±95%置信区间),而CY/TBI组为62±6%(P = 0.002),2年无白血病生存率分别为14±4%和34±6%(P = 0.002)。在接受来自HLA相同同胞的骨髓移植的BMT受者(配对391×2)中,所有组中两种治疗方法的TRM、RI和LFS均无显著差异。特别是,AML CR-1患者中,接受BU/CY治疗(n = 237)的患者2年LFS为64±3%,而接受CY/TBI治疗(n = 237)的患者为66±3%。在所有组中,通过对预后因素的多变量分析证实了这些发现。对于ABMT和BMT患者,与CY/TBI组相比,BU/CY组肝静脉闭塞病(VOD)(P < 0.05)和出血性膀胱炎(P < 0.001)更为常见。总之,除了诊断至移植时间超过2年的ALL中期阶段的ABMT外,BU/CY和CY/TBI作为移植前预处理方案在所有情况下都产生了相似的结果,在该情况下,CY/TBI与较低的RI和较高的LFS相关。