Mick R, Vokes E E, Lestingi T M, Gray-Stern W, Fleming G F, Schilsky R L, Ratain M J
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, IL 60637, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Mar;59(3):349-59. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(96)80013-0.
To construct an efficient pilot study design to determine whether interferon alfa-2b modifies the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion etoposide.
A two-stage randomized 2 X 2 factorial design was used to evaluate interferon alfa-2b at two doses (2 or 10 MU/m2/day SQ for 3 days) and two schedules (interferon alfa-2b administered before or concurrent with 72-hour continuous-infusion etoposide). Etoposide was administered at 75, 100, or 125 mg/m2/day. In lieu of comparing the experimental arms to an etoposide-alone control arm to determine effect of interferon alfa-2b dose and schedule, a novel analytic approach was used. The effect of interferon alfa-2b on etoposide-induced leukopenia was assessed indirectly by comparison of the observed white blood cell (WBC) nadir to the nadir predicted from an established pharmacodynamic model for single agent etoposide.
Based on 29 patients, dose-normalized 24-hour total and estimated free etoposide concentrations did not differ with interferon alfa-2b dose or schedule. Patients treated with interferon alfa-2b before etoposide had, on average a WBC nadir 545 +/- 225 cells microliter lower than that predicted by a pharmacodynamic model for etoposide alone. An optimal nonlinear model for leukopenia was defined by interferon alfa-2b schedule in addition to 24-hour etoposide concentration.
A novel study design and statistical analysis provided an efficient preliminary evaluation of the combination of interferon alfa-2b with etoposide in a modest number of patients. Exploitation of a previously validated pharmacodynamic model allowed evaluation of interferon alfa-2b effect and eliminated the need for an etoposide-alone control arm. The pharmacokinetics of continuous-infusion etoposide at doses from 75 to 125 mg/m2/day appear to be unchanged by interferon alfa-2b at the doses and schedules tested and the combination appears to be feasible. We hypothesize that leukopenia may be enhanced when interferon alfa-2b is administered before etoposide, especially at a higher dose of interferon alfa-2b.
构建一项高效的初步研究设计,以确定干扰素α-2b是否会改变持续输注依托泊苷的药代动力学和药效学。
采用两阶段随机2×2析因设计,评估两种剂量(2或10 MU/m²/天,皮下注射,共3天)和两种给药方案(干扰素α-2b在72小时持续输注依托泊苷之前或同时给药)的干扰素α-2b。依托泊苷的给药剂量为75、100或125 mg/m²/天。为了确定干扰素α-2b剂量和给药方案的效果,未将试验组与单独使用依托泊苷的对照组进行比较,而是采用了一种新颖的分析方法。通过将观察到的白细胞(WBC)最低点与根据已建立的单药依托泊苷药效学模型预测的最低点进行比较,间接评估干扰素α-2b对依托泊苷诱导的白细胞减少的影响。
基于29例患者,剂量标准化的24小时总依托泊苷浓度和游离依托泊苷估计浓度在干扰素α-2b剂量或给药方案方面没有差异。在依托泊苷之前接受干扰素α-2b治疗的患者,其白细胞最低点平均比单独使用依托泊苷的药效学模型预测值低545±225个/微升。除了24小时依托泊苷浓度外,还根据干扰素α-2b给药方案定义了白细胞减少的最佳非线性模型。
一种新颖的研究设计和统计分析为在少数患者中对干扰素α-2b与依托泊苷联合用药进行了有效的初步评估。利用先前验证的药效学模型可以评估干扰素α-2b的效果,并且无需单独使用依托泊苷的对照组。在测试的剂量和给药方案下,干扰素α-2b似乎不会改变75至125 mg/m²/天剂量的持续输注依托泊苷的药代动力学,并且联合用药似乎是可行的。我们假设,当在依托泊苷之前给予干扰素α-2b时,尤其是较高剂量的干扰素α-2b,白细胞减少可能会加剧。