Fairbrother G, Friedman S, DuMont K A, Lobach K S
Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
Pediatrics. 1996 Jun;97(6 Pt 1):785-90.
This study examines coverage levels for immunization, missed opportunities to immunize, and extent of lead and tuberculosis screening in inner-city storefront physician offices and then relates child, visit, and physician characteristics to missed opportunities.
With the use of a nested sampling strategy, 232 charts were selected for review in 31 physicians' offices. Charts selected were for children 0 to 35 months of age who had three or more visits in more than 3 months. Physicians were selected from those in specific low-income New York inner-city neighborhoods who submitted large volumes of Medicaid billing claims. Variables examined were missed opportunities to immunize, immunization coverage levels, lead, and tuberculosis screening. The outcome measure was missed opportunities to immunize.
Only 26% of the children were up to date for their age for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTP), oral polio vaccine (OPV), and measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) compared with a city-wide coverage level of 49%. Children who were not up to date for immunization coverage were more likely not to be up to date for lead (RR = 1.24, CI 0.96 to 1.60) or tuberculosis (RR = 1.54, CI 1.14 to 2.08) screening. Physicians miss opportunities to immunize in 84% of the eligible visits. Opportunities to immunize are missed more frequently at sick care or follow-up visits (95% and 91% missed opportunities) than at well care visits (41% missed opportunities).
The quality of pediatric primary care given by these inner-city storefront physicians is suboptimal. Sick and follow-up visits predominate; well care visits are infrequent. If care is to be improved, Medicaid reimbursement policies, which make delivery of well care unprofitable, will need to be changed. In addition, monitoring the quality of care will need to be more aggressive. In the near future children who receive Medicaid in New York will be in managed care. If reimbursement and monitoring policies that provide incentives for delivering pediatric primary care are to be in place, it will be the managed care plans that implement this.
本研究调查了市中心临街诊所的免疫接种覆盖率、免疫接种错失机会以及铅和结核病筛查程度,然后将儿童、就诊及医生特征与错失机会相关联。
采用嵌套抽样策略,从31家医生诊所中选取232份病历进行审查。选取的病历为0至35个月龄、在3个多月内就诊3次或以上的儿童。医生选自纽约特定低收入市中心社区中提交大量医疗补助计费申请的医生。所检查的变量包括免疫接种错失机会、免疫接种覆盖率、铅和结核病筛查。结果指标为免疫接种错失机会。
与全市49%的覆盖率相比,只有26%的儿童白喉、破伤风、百日咳(DTP)、口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)以及麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹(MMR)的接种符合其年龄阶段要求。免疫接种覆盖率未达标的儿童更有可能未进行铅(相对风险 = 1.24,可信区间0.96至1.60)或结核病(相对风险 = 1.54,可信区间1.14至2.08)筛查。医生在84%的符合条件就诊中错失免疫接种机会。在疾病护理或随访就诊时错失免疫接种机会的频率(分别为95%和91%)高于健康护理就诊(41%)。
这些市中心临街诊所提供的儿科初级护理质量欠佳。疾病护理和随访就诊占主导;健康护理就诊较少。若要改善护理,需要改变使健康护理无利可图的医疗补助报销政策。此外,需要更积极地监测护理质量。在不久的将来,纽约接受医疗补助的儿童将纳入管理式医疗。若要制定为提供儿科初级护理提供激励的报销和监测政策,将由管理式医疗计划来实施。