Pilz P K, Schnitzler H U
Department of Animal Physiology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, D-72076, Federal Republic of Germany.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1996 Jul;66(1):67-79. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0044.
The amplitude of the acoustic startle response habituates to repetitive stimulation. The input and output of the startle system were measured to determine if the decrease in startle amplitude during repetitive stimulation is due to an increase in the startle threshold. Two experimental approaches were used in 35 Sprague-Dawley rats to probe the relationship between the input (the sound pressure level of the stimulus) and the behavioral output (startle amplitude). The results show that the minimum threshold for a response does not change during habituation; rather, the slope of the dependence of startle amplitude on stimulus level decreases. Because habituation does not influence startle threshold we propose that the site for habituation is located in the neural circuitry downstream from the site for startle threshold. Besides amplitude and threshold, as an additional parameter we measured startle latency. In general, the latency of the acoustic startle response is negatively correlated with the response amplitude. This correlation has been repeatedly shown, therefore one would expect a latency increase during the amplitude decrease caused by habituation. However, the latency of the startle reaction also decreased during the course of repetitive stimulation. According to the dual process theory of habituation, a stimulus has both a response-decreasing, i. e., habituating, as well as a response-increasing, i.e., sensitizing, influence on a behavior (Groves & Thompson, 1970). Our explanation of the present results is that startle amplitude is reduced following repetitive stimulation because it is mainly influenced by habituation; latency, however, is shortened because it is mainly influenced by sensitization.
听觉惊吓反应的幅度会随着重复刺激而产生习惯化。对惊吓系统的输入和输出进行测量,以确定重复刺激期间惊吓幅度的降低是否是由于惊吓阈值的升高所致。在35只Sprague-Dawley大鼠中采用了两种实验方法,以探究输入(刺激的声压级)与行为输出(惊吓幅度)之间的关系。结果表明,在习惯化过程中,反应的最小阈值没有变化;相反,惊吓幅度对刺激水平的依赖斜率降低。由于习惯化不影响惊吓阈值,我们提出习惯化的位点位于惊吓阈值位点下游的神经回路中。除了幅度和阈值外,作为一个额外的参数,我们还测量了惊吓潜伏期。一般来说,听觉惊吓反应的潜伏期与反应幅度呈负相关。这种相关性已被反复证明,因此人们会预期在习惯化导致幅度降低的过程中潜伏期会增加。然而,在重复刺激过程中,惊吓反应的潜伏期也缩短了。根据习惯化的双过程理论,一个刺激对一种行为既有降低反应(即习惯化)的影响,也有增强反应(即敏感化)的影响(Groves & Thompson,1970)。我们对当前结果的解释是,重复刺激后惊吓幅度降低是因为它主要受习惯化影响;然而,潜伏期缩短是因为它主要受敏感化影响。