Suppr超能文献

Benefits of the low pressure multichannel endotracheal ventilation.

作者信息

Pinquier D, Pavlovic D, Boussignac G, Aubier M, Beaufils F

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Pédiatrique, Hopital Robert Debré, Paris, France.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Jul;154(1):82-90. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/154.3_Pt_2.S82.

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation using a modified endotracheal tube, allowing bypass and washout of the endotracheal dead space (McETV), was compared with conventional controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) in healthy and in surfactant-depleted rabbits. In healthy animals, shifting from CMV to McETV led to an increase in PaO2 (89 +/- 16 versus 104 +/- 13 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and a decrease in PaCO2 (41.5 +/- 3 versus 30 +/- 3 mm Hg; p < 0.05). As a result of reducing the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) from 21 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 2 cm H2O (p < 0.05), it was possible in McETV mode to maintain comparable ventilation to that achieved by CMV. In surfactant-depleted animals, compared with CMV, McETV produced a rise in PaO2 without change in thoracic volume (from 100 +/- 40 to 150 +/- 60 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and a fall in PaCO2 (from 46 +/- 5 to 37 +/- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05). After 4 h of ventilation, the surfactant-depleted animals from the CMV group developed thoracic overdistension quicker (at hour 1, p < 0.05) and, consequently, more animals died from pneumothorax compared with the McETV group (five versus two). We concluded that McETV ensured adequate gas exchanges with lower insufflation pressures and could diminish positive pressure ventilation-induced injury.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验