Suppr超能文献

通过儿童期人格测量预测青少年攻击性:投射程序、自我报告测试和行为评定的比较。

Prediction of adolescent aggression by childhood personality measures: a comparison of projective procedures, self-report tests, and behavior ratings.

作者信息

Graybill D, Blackwood A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal 61761-4620, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1996 Jan;52(1):61-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199601)52:1<61::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO;2-Z.

Abstract

Projective procedures, self-report measures, and teacher behavior ratings were compared as to which type of assessment best predicted adolescent aggressive behavior 6 years after they were administered. A questionnaire that assesses aggressive behavior was given to 125 adolescents in grades seven through twelve who had been administered a variety of projective, self-report, and teacher ratings of aggression 5 years earlier. Their parents were given the same questionnaire. Controlling for sex, age, and academic ability, the results indicated that children's scores on the projective measures predicted aggressive behaviors 5 years later. In addition, projective procedures were at least as valid as the other types of assessments in predicting aggressive behaviors. Results suggest that criticisms of projective procedures may be addressed with continued efforts to evaluate their validity.

摘要

对投射性程序、自我报告测量方法和教师行为评级进行了比较,以确定哪种评估类型能最好地预测青少年在接受评估6年后的攻击性行为。向125名七至十二年级的青少年发放了一份评估攻击性行为的问卷,这些青少年在5年前曾接受过各种投射性、自我报告和教师对攻击行为的评级。他们的父母也收到了同样的问卷。在控制了性别、年龄和学业能力后,结果表明,投射性测量方法中儿童的得分可以预测5年后的攻击性行为。此外,在预测攻击性行为方面,投射性程序至少与其他类型的评估一样有效。结果表明,对投射性程序的批评可以通过持续努力评估其有效性来解决。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验