Ophthalmology. 1996 Jul;103(7):1144-51.
Automated perimetry is one product of the computer revolution that has had a dramatic impact on the practice of ophthalmology, affecting the quality of both the perimetric test (perimetric technique) and the interpretation of the test results. Before automation, the quality of visual field technique in many practices was poor, partly because perimetrists lacked the volume of patients requiring the test to provide training sufficient to maintain a high level of experience and expertise. At first, automated perimetry was developed simply to make available to all practitioners visual field testing that was nearly as good as the most skilled manual perimetry. The data provided by first-generation automated perimeters lacked the accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility obtainable from a highly skilled manual perimetrist. As automated perimeters evolved, perimetric techniques and the software that analyzes data for clinical significance were improved. The use of automated perimetry to evaluate routinely various visual disorders that require testing of the visual field has increased significantly. Statistical analysis of the test results aids interpretation, both to determine if the field is abnormal and if there is change in the field from one occasion to another, especially in the context of glaucoma. The test is excellent; it is now standardized, with better test algorithms, and in many cases it achieves better results than the best manual perimetrist. However, attention to detail and skill in administering the automated test are still essential. The future will hold further improvements. Nevertheless, as each manufacturer enhances computerized perimetry, it may become more difficult to compare the test results among instruments or even between two test algorithms on the same instrument. In addition, clinical knowledge and experience will still be necessary to reach accurate diagnostic conclusions.
自动视野计是计算机革命的产物之一,对眼科实践产生了巨大影响,影响了视野检测(视野检测技术)的质量以及检测结果的解读。在自动化之前,许多机构的视野检测技术质量很差,部分原因是视野检查者缺乏足够数量需要进行该项检测的患者来提供维持高水平经验和专业技能所需的培训。起初,开发自动视野计仅仅是为了让所有从业者都能进行几乎与最熟练的手动视野计检测效果相当的视野检测。第一代自动视野计提供的数据缺乏从高技能手动视野检查者那里可获得的准确性、敏感性和可重复性。随着自动视野计的发展,视野检测技术以及分析数据临床意义的软件都得到了改进。使用自动视野计常规评估各种需要进行视野检测的视觉障碍的情况显著增加。对检测结果进行统计分析有助于解读,既可以确定视野是否异常,也可以确定从一次检测到另一次检测视野是否有变化,尤其是在青光眼的情况下。这项检测非常出色;现在它已经标准化,拥有更好的检测算法,并且在许多情况下,它比最优秀的手动视野检查者取得的结果还要好。然而,在进行自动检测时注重细节和技能仍然至关重要。未来将会有进一步的改进。尽管如此,随着每个制造商改进计算机化视野计,在不同仪器之间甚至同一仪器上的两种检测算法之间比较检测结果可能会变得更加困难。此外,要得出准确的诊断结论仍然需要临床知识和经验。