Rosholm J U, Gram L F, Damsbo N, Hallas J
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University, Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Dec;13(4):281-6. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996776.
To elucidate potential problems concerning the use of antidepressants (AD) in general practice.
Cross-sectional, descriptive interview study.
General practices, Odense, Denmark.
Random sample consisting of 98 AD users from 12 general practices.
Indication for AD treatment, justification of the treatment, duration of AD treatment, daily dose of AD, side effects, Hamilton depression rating, WONCA score.
The primary indication for AD treatment was depression (72 patients), partly regular depression (therapeutic/prophylactic treatment) (n = 39), partly depressive tendencies (n = 32) (1 unknown). Median treatment duration was 3 years; 25% had been in treatment for more than 10 years. The general practitioners judged the treatment problematic/unacceptable in 23 cases, largely because of uncertain indication or because other or no treatment was considered better for the patient. The daily doses of AD were generally low. Side effects were modest. The patients often had a relatively high depression score and poor status according to the WONCA-scale.
The use of low doses, long duration of treatment, and uncertainty about the relevance of the treatment are important features of the use of AD by general practitioners. There seems to be a discrepancy between the use of AD in general practice and the scientifically-based recommendations.
阐明在全科医疗中使用抗抑郁药(AD)可能存在的问题。
横断面描述性访谈研究。
丹麦欧登塞的全科医疗诊所。
从12家全科医疗诊所随机抽取的98名使用抗抑郁药的患者。
抗抑郁药治疗的适应证、治疗的合理性、抗抑郁药治疗的持续时间、抗抑郁药的日剂量、副作用、汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分、全科医学问卷(WONCA)评分。
抗抑郁药治疗的主要适应证为抑郁症(72例患者),部分为常规抑郁症(治疗性/预防性治疗)(n = 39),部分为抑郁倾向(n = 32)(1例情况不明)。治疗持续时间的中位数为3年;25%的患者治疗时间超过10年。全科医生认为23例治疗存在问题/不可接受,主要原因是适应证不明确,或者认为其他治疗或不治疗对患者更好。抗抑郁药的日剂量普遍较低。副作用较小。根据全科医学问卷量表,患者的抑郁评分通常较高,健康状况较差。
低剂量使用、治疗持续时间长以及治疗相关性的不确定性是全科医生使用抗抑郁药的重要特征。全科医疗中抗抑郁药的使用与基于科学的建议之间似乎存在差异。