• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[直肠乙状结肠交界处癌的肿瘤分期及随访:结肠镜超声检查与CT、MRI及直肠内MRI的比较]

[Tumor staging and follow-up care in rectosigmoid carcinoma: colonoscopic endosonography compared to CT, MRI and endorectal MRI].

作者信息

Meyenberger C, Wildi S, Külling D, Bertschinger P, Zala G F, Klotz H P, Krestin G P

机构信息

Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Universitätsspital Zürich.

出版信息

Praxis (Bern 1994). 1996 May 7;85(19):622-31.

PMID:8693230
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endosonography has become the best available method for local staging of primary rectal cancer and diagnosing recurrent local tumor. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), using an echo colonoscope (CF-UM 3, CF-UM 20, Olympus optical) to computed tomography (CT), body coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (EMRI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 1991 to July 1993 90 patients with primary rectosigmoidal tumors (n = 32: 9 women, 23 men, mean age 68 years [range 37 to 84]) or follow-up examinations for recurrent local cancer (patients: n = 58, examinations: n = 93; 41 women, 52 men, mean age 61 years [range 31 to 84]) were investigated. The results of preoperative examinations were compared to histopathological findings regarding T and N stages.

RESULTS

In T staging, accuracy of EUS (78%) was superior to CT (50%) and equivalent to both MRI (75%) and EMRI (80%). The accuracy of EUS (84%) in assessing transmural tumor infiltration was superior to CT, MRT and EMRT (50%, 75% and 80%, resp.); however, CT (77%) and MRI (86%) were more accurate than EUS (64%) and EMRI (33%) in assessing N stages. Recurrent local cancer was found in 22 patients. All but one were detected by EUS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in follow-up examinations for recurrent disease for EUS were 95%, 94% and 95%, for CT 75%, 73% and 74%, for MRI 57%, 100% and 70%, and for EMRI 83%, 100% and 90% resp.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ultrasound proved to be a safe and accurate method of preoperative staging and early diagnosis of recurrent rectal cancer and was superior or at least equivalent to CT, MRI and EMRI.

摘要

背景与研究目的

内镜超声已成为原发性直肠癌局部分期及诊断局部复发性肿瘤的最佳可用方法。本前瞻性研究的目的是比较使用超声结肠镜(CF-UM 3、CF-UM 20,奥林巴斯光学)的内镜超声(EUS)与计算机断层扫描(CT)、体部线圈磁共振成像(MRI)及直肠内线圈磁共振成像(EMRI)的准确性。

患者与方法

1991年2月至1993年7月,对90例原发性直肠乙状结肠肿瘤患者(n = 32:9例女性,23例男性,平均年龄68岁[范围37至84岁])或局部复发性癌症的随访检查患者(患者:n = 58,检查:n = 93;41例女性,52例男性,平均年龄61岁[范围31至84岁])进行了研究。将术前检查结果与关于T和N分期的组织病理学结果进行比较。

结果

在T分期中,EUS的准确性(78%)优于CT(50%),与MRI(75%)和EMRI(80%)相当。EUS评估透壁肿瘤浸润的准确性(84%)优于CT、MRT和EMRT(分别为50%、75%和80%);然而,在评估N分期方面,CT(77%)和MRI(86%)比EUS(64%)和EMRI(33%)更准确。22例患者发现局部复发性癌症。除1例患者外,所有病例均由EUS检测到。EUS对复发性疾病随访检查的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为95%、94%和95%,CT分别为75%、73%和74%,MRI分别为57%、100%和70%,EMRI分别为83%、100%和90%。

结论

内镜超声被证明是术前分期及早期诊断复发性直肠癌的一种安全且准确的方法,并且优于或至少等同于CT、MRI和EMRI。

相似文献

1
[Tumor staging and follow-up care in rectosigmoid carcinoma: colonoscopic endosonography compared to CT, MRI and endorectal MRI].[直肠乙状结肠交界处癌的肿瘤分期及随访:结肠镜超声检查与CT、MRI及直肠内MRI的比较]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1996 May 7;85(19):622-31.
2
Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.内镜超声与直肠内磁共振成像:一项关于直肠癌术前分期及随访的前瞻性对比研究。
Endoscopy. 1995 Sep;27(7):469-79. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005751.
3
[Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].[磁共振成像(0.5T)、计算机断层扫描和直肠内超声检查在直肠-乙状结肠肿瘤术前分期中的比较。与手术及解剖病理学结果的相关性]
Radiol Med. 1993 Jun;85(6):773-83.
4
Colorectal cancer. Radiologic staging.结直肠癌。放射学分期。
Radiol Clin North Am. 1997 Mar;35(2):457-85.
5
A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.直肠内超声与盆腔磁共振成像在直肠癌术前分期中的前瞻性比较
Ann Ital Chir. 2006 Jan-Feb;77(1):41-6.
6
Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.直肠肿瘤的术前分期:直肠内超声、水灌肠CT及高分辨率直肠内MRI的比较
Onkologie. 2008 May;31(5):230-5. doi: 10.1159/000121359. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
7
Accuracy of MRI with an endorectal coil for staging endometrial cancer.使用直肠内线圈的MRI对子宫内膜癌进行分期的准确性。
Acta Radiol. 2012 Jun 1;53(5):580-5. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110617. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.直肠内线圈磁共振成像在直肠癌局部分期中的应用
Radiol Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;103(1-2):74-83.
9
A comparison between the reference values of MRI and EUS and their usefulness to surgeons in rectal cancer.MRI 和 EUS 的参考值比较及其对直肠癌外科医生的有用性。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Dec;16(15):2069-77.
10
Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT, and MRI.壶腹肿瘤的内镜超声重新评估:与经腹超声、CT及MRI的相关性
J Clin Ultrasound. 2009 Jan;37(1):18-25. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20523.