Berger R C, McLeod P
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, England.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Feb;22(1):114-21. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.1.114.
J. Driver and P. McLeod (1992) reported that the ease of visual search for targets defined by a conjunction of movement and orientation was affected by an interaction between target movement and target-nontarget discriminability. When the orientation discrimination to distinguish target from nontarget was difficult, stationary targets were easier to find than moving targets. But when the orientation discrimination to distinguish target from nontarget was easy, moving targets were easier to find than stationary targets. H. J. Müller and J. Maxwell (1994) repeated the experiment but failed to find the interaction. The authors show that the difference between these results was due to the density of the visual displays used. With a high-density display, the authors replicate Driver and McLeod's result; with a low-density display, they replicate Müller and Maxwell's result.
J. 德赖弗和P. 麦克劳德(1992年)报告称,由运动和方向结合定义的目标的视觉搜索难易程度受到目标运动与目标-非目标可辨别性之间相互作用的影响。当区分目标与非目标的方向辨别困难时,静止目标比运动目标更容易被发现。但当区分目标与非目标的方向辨别容易时,运动目标比静止目标更容易被发现。H. J. 米勒和J. 麦克斯韦(1994年)重复了该实验,但未发现这种相互作用。作者表明,这些结果的差异是由于所使用视觉显示的密度不同。使用高密度显示时,作者重现了德赖弗和麦克劳德的结果;使用低密度显示时,他们重现了米勒和麦克斯韦的结果。