Phillips C A, Michniak B B
Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 1995 Dec;84(12):1427-33. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600841208.
Six model drugs were selected for this study based on their degree of lipophilicity as represented by their log P values (range = -0.95 to 3.51). They included 2,4-dihydroxy-5-fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil); 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (caffeine); [(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino]-acetic acid (salicyluric acid); 2-hydroxybenzoic acid (salicylic acid); 9 alpha-fluoro-16 alpha-hydroxyprednisolone 16 alpha, 17 alpha-acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide); and alpha-methyl-4-[2-methylpropyl]benzeneacetic acid (ibuprofen). Six dermal penetration enhancers [Azone or 1-dodecylhexahydro-2H-azepin-2-one (1), N-dodecyl-2-pyrrolidinone (2), N-dodecyl-2-piperidinone (3), N-dodecyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)acetamide (4), N-(2,2-dihydroxyethyl)dodecylamine (5), and 2-(1-nonyl)-1,3-dioxolane (6)] were tested in vitro across full-thickness hairless mouse skin with each of the drugs. The relationship between lipophilicity (log P) and efficacy (represented by the enhancement ratio of flux) of the drugs when coadministered with the enhancers was examined using linear regression. The three cyclic enhancers (1-3) exhibited linear relationships, indicating that they were more effective at enhancing the penetration of hydrophilic drugs R2 = 0.8997 for 1, 0.8801 for 2, and 0.804 for 3) when evaluating all the model drugs except triamcinolone acetonide (TA). The two acyclic enhancers (4 and 5) showed a similar relationship, but their correlation coefficients were lower at 0.6463 for 4 and 0.6213 for 5. Studies with the dioxolane (6) yielded no relationship between the lipophilicity of the drug and the efficacy of the enhancer, with an R2 of 0.002. Overall, 6 was the least effective enhancer studied. The steroid TA was not included in the linear regression analysis. Of the six model drugs studied, TA exhibited the largest increase in transdermal delivery when enhancers 1-6 were used.
基于六种模型药物的脂水分配系数(log P值范围为-0.95至3.51)所代表的亲脂性程度,挑选出这六种药物用于本研究。它们包括2,4 - 二羟基 - 5 - 氟嘧啶(5 - 氟尿嘧啶);1,3,7 - 三甲基黄嘌呤(咖啡因);[(2 - 羟基苯甲酰基)氨基]乙酸(水杨尿酸);2 - 羟基苯甲酸(水杨酸);9α - 氟 - 16α - 羟基泼尼松龙16α,17α - 丙酮化物(曲安奈德);以及α - 甲基 - 4 - [2 - 甲基丙基]苯乙酸(布洛芬)。六种皮肤渗透促进剂[Azone或1 - 十二烷基六氢 - 2H - 氮杂环庚烷 - 2 - 酮(1)、N - 十二烷基 - 2 - 吡咯烷酮(2)、N - 十二烷基 - 2 - 哌啶酮(3)、N - 十二烷基 - N - (2 - 甲氧基乙基)乙酰胺(4)、N - (2,2 - 二羟基乙基)十二烷基胺(5)和2 - (1 - 壬基)-1,3 - 二氧戊环(6)]与每种药物一起在体外通过全层无毛小鼠皮肤进行测试。使用线性回归研究了与促进剂共同给药时药物的亲脂性(log P)与疗效(以通量增强率表示)之间的关系。三种环状促进剂(1 - 3)呈现线性关系,表明在评估除曲安奈德(TA)之外的所有模型药物时,它们在增强亲水性药物的渗透方面更有效(1的R2 = 0.8997,2的R2 = 0.8801,3的R2 = 0.804)。两种非环状促进剂(4和5)显示出类似的关系,但它们的相关系数较低,4为0.6463,5为0.6213。对二氧戊环(6)的研究未发现药物亲脂性与促进剂疗效之间的关系,R2为0.002。总体而言,6是所研究的最无效的促进剂。类固醇TA未纳入线性回归分析。在所研究的六种模型药物中,当使用促进剂1 - 6时,TA的透皮给药增加幅度最大。