Murohara T, Guo J P, Delyani J A, Lefer A M
Department of Physiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Oct;17(8):499-507.
The complement (C) system-mediated neutrophil activation, adhesion to the coronary endothelium and accumulation into cardiac tissue are key steps in the pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI/R) injury. We examined the differential role of the classical and the alternative complement pathway in MI/R injury in vivo. Rats were subjected to 20 min of myocardial ischemia followed by 24 h of reperfusion. Either a classical pathway inhibitor [C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) (15 mg/kg)] or an alternative pathway inhibitor soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1)[des-LHR-A](15 mg/kg) or their vehicle were administered intravenously 1 min prior to reperfusion, and myocardial necrosis (creatine kinase loss) and neutrophil accumulation, cardiac myeloperoxidase activity, were examined. C1-INH significantly attenuated cardiac creatine kinase loss compared to MI/R rats given only vehicle (p < 0.05) 24 h after reperfusion. An alternative pathway inhibitor, sCR1 [des-LHR-A] attenuated myocardial injury to a lesser extent, although it was not significantly different from the value for C1-INH or vehicle. Besides cardiac myeloperoxidase activity, the ischemic cardiac tissue was significantly attenuated by both C1-INH and sCR1[desLHR-A] (p < 0.05 vs. vehicle). Both the classical and alternative pathways may contribute to MI/R injury via a neutrophil-dependent mechanism in vivo. Selective inhibition of the classical pathway of complement activation seems to be slightly more effective in limiting necrotic MI/R injury than the selective alternative pathway inhibition in this 24 h model of reperfusion injury, but equal doses of each inhibitor attenuated neutrophil accumulation.
补体(C)系统介导的中性粒细胞活化、与冠状动脉内皮的黏附以及在心脏组织中的聚集是心肌缺血再灌注(MI/R)损伤发病机制中的关键步骤。我们在体内研究了经典补体途径和替代补体途径在MI/R损伤中的不同作用。对大鼠进行20分钟的心肌缺血,随后再灌注24小时。在再灌注前1分钟静脉注射经典途径抑制剂[C1酯酶抑制剂(C1-INH)(15毫克/千克)]或替代途径抑制剂可溶性补体受体1(sCR1)[去-LHR-A](15毫克/千克)或其溶媒,然后检测心肌坏死(肌酸激酶损失)以及中性粒细胞聚集情况、心脏髓过氧化物酶活性。与仅给予溶媒的MI/R大鼠相比,再灌注24小时后C1-INH显著减轻了心脏肌酸激酶损失(p<0.05)。替代途径抑制剂sCR1[去-LHR-A]对心肌损伤的减轻程度较小,尽管与C1-INH或溶媒的值无显著差异。除了心脏髓过氧化物酶活性外,C1-INH和sCR1[去-LHR-A]均显著减轻了缺血心脏组织的损伤(与溶媒相比,p<0.05)。在体内,经典途径和替代途径可能均通过中性粒细胞依赖性机制促成MI/R损伤。在这个24小时的再灌注损伤模型中,选择性抑制补体激活的经典途径在限制坏死性MI/R损伤方面似乎比选择性抑制替代途径略有效,但每种抑制剂的等剂量均可减轻中性粒细胞聚集。