Medical reviews and the importance of being a "peer" in science.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Beritic T

机构信息

Division of Medicine, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Isr J Med Sci. 1996 Jul;32(7):573-5.

PMID:8756988

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Medical reviews and the importance of being a "peer" in science.

Isr J Med Sci. 1996 Jul;32(7):573-5.

When reviewers disagree.

Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):211. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.090806.

Confidential reports may improve peer review.

Nature. 2004 Mar 18;428(6980):255. doi: 10.1038/428255c.

Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.

Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;38(4):5-9.

Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.

Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):404. Epub 2005 Jun 17.

Disruption to science in developing countries.

Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):480. doi: 10.1038/423480c.

[Standardization of reviews of scientific publications].

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009 Jul-Aug;72(4):574-5; author reply 575.

[Unfair peer review process?].

Pflege. 2013 Oct;26(5):368. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000325.

Where did the scientific method go?

Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):28-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0108-28.

Response to Where did the scientific method go?

Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):29. doi: 10.1038/nbt0108-29a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Medical reviews and the importance of being a "peer" in science.

Isr J Med Sci. 1996 Jul;32(7):573-5.

When reviewers disagree.

Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):211. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.090806.

Confidential reports may improve peer review.

Nature. 2004 Mar 18;428(6980):255. doi: 10.1038/428255c.

Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.

Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;38(4):5-9.

Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.

Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):404. Epub 2005 Jun 17.

Disruption to science in developing countries.

Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):480. doi: 10.1038/423480c.

[Standardization of reviews of scientific publications].

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009 Jul-Aug;72(4):574-5; author reply 575.

[Unfair peer review process?].

Pflege. 2013 Oct;26(5):368. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000325.

Where did the scientific method go?

Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):28-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0108-28.

Response to Where did the scientific method go?

Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):29. doi: 10.1038/nbt0108-29a.