Suppr超能文献

门诊普通体格检查中用于病例发现的实验室检查的检出率。

Yield of laboratory tests for case-finding in the ambulatory general medical examination.

作者信息

Boland B J, Wollan P C, Silverstein M D

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1996 Aug;101(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)80068-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of frequently obtained laboratory tests for case-finding in the comprehensive ambulatory medical examination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in four Mayo Clinic general internal medicine divisions that provide care to community, regional, and geographically distant patients. The main outcome measurements were the diagnostic yield and therapeutic yield of the complete blood count, chemistry panel, lipid profile, thyroid tests, and urinalysis ordered for case-finding.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,508 laboratory tests consisting of 7,008 individual components were obtained for case-finding in the 531 patients (mean age 63 +/- 14 years; 57% female). Thirty-six percent (544 of 1508) of the tests were abnormal, of which 6% (33 of 544) were repeated and 9% (47 of 544) led to further investigations. The 1,508 case-finding tests had a diagnostic yield of 4.8% (73 new diagnoses) and a therapeutic yield of 4.0% (60 new therapies). The therapeutic yield of each test ordered for case-finding was as follows: lipid profile (16.5%), chemistry panel (2.8%), complete blood count (0.9%), urinalysis (0.8%), and thyroid tests (0.7%). Therapeutic yield was not associated with patient's age, gender, or referral distance but was approximately twice as high in new patients compared with established patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of treatments for conditions identified by case-finding laboratory tests resulted from the lipid profile. The therapeutic yield of the chemistry panel was low, and the therapeutic yield of the complete blood count, thyroid tests, and urinalysis were all less than 1%. The low therapeutic yield of many routine laboratory tests ordered for case-finding should be provided to patients, physicians, and managed care organizations to set priorities for case-finding and screening.

摘要

目的

探讨在综合门诊医学检查中,为病例筛查而频繁进行的实验室检查的诊断和治疗价值。

患者与方法

在梅奥诊所的四个普通内科科室开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,这些科室为社区、地区及地理位置较远的患者提供医疗服务。主要观察指标为用于病例筛查的全血细胞计数、化学检查、血脂谱、甲状腺检查及尿液分析的诊断价值和治疗价值。

结果

总体而言,为531例患者(平均年龄63±14岁;57%为女性)进行病例筛查共获得1508项实验室检查,包含7008个单项指标。36%(1508项中的544项)的检查结果异常,其中6%(544项中的33项)为复查异常,9%(544项中的47项)导致进一步检查。这1508项病例筛查检查的诊断价值为4.8%(73例新诊断),治疗价值为4.0%(60项新治疗措施)。为病例筛查所做的每项检查的治疗价值如下:血脂谱(16.5%)、化学检查(2.8%)、全血细胞计数(0.9%)、尿液分析(0.8%)及甲状腺检查(0.7%)。治疗价值与患者年龄、性别或转诊距离无关,但新患者的治疗价值约为老患者的两倍。

结论

通过病例筛查实验室检查所发现疾病的大多数治疗措施源于血脂谱检查。化学检查的治疗价值较低,全血细胞计数、甲状腺检查及尿液分析的治疗价值均低于1%。应将为病例筛查所做的许多常规实验室检查的低治疗价值告知患者、医生及管理式医疗组织,以便为病例筛查和筛查设定优先次序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验