Huber B R, Anderson R
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Charleston, South Carolina 29424, USA.
Med Anthropol. 1996 May;17(1):23-38. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1996.9966126.
In the indigenous Mexican village of Hueyapan, there is a clear contrast between the supernatural beliefs curers use to explain illness and the naturalistic assumptions made by this community's bonesetters. In addition to employing different conceptual models, the two types of healers differ with respect to their manner of recruitment, training, types of illnesses treated, social status, and gender. These differences add up to a seeming enigma: in a community where men largely control political, economic, and religious affairs, the higher status role of curer is undertaken most frequently by women and the lower status specialty of bonesetter by men. Hueyapan's health care system becomes less problematical, however, when it is recognized that recruitment to the bonesetter and curer roles is shaped by pragmatic considerations of role continuity and compatibility independent of the social status of these two occupations.
在墨西哥本土村庄韦亚潘,治疗者用以解释疾病的超自然信仰与该社区接骨师的自然主义假设形成鲜明对比。除了采用不同的概念模型外,这两类治疗者在招募方式、培训、治疗的疾病类型、社会地位和性别方面也存在差异。这些差异加起来构成了一个看似难解的谜团:在一个男性在很大程度上控制着政治、经济和宗教事务的社区里,治疗者这一较高地位的角色大多由女性承担,而接骨师这一较低地位的专业则由男性担任。然而,当认识到接骨师和治疗者角色的招募是由与这两种职业的社会地位无关的角色连续性和兼容性的实际考虑所塑造时,韦亚潘的医疗保健系统就不那么成问题了。