Suppr超能文献

慢性丙型肝炎患者的α-干扰素再治疗

alpha-Interferon retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

作者信息

Rabinovitz M, Block G, Finkelstein S D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Aug;91(8):1523-6.

PMID:8759654
Abstract

To evaluate the effect of a second cycle of alpha-IFN treatment on patients who have not responded to a first cycle or responded and relapsed, 37 patients, 25 men and 12 women, mean age 41 yr, were retreated with alpha-interferon (IFN). Seven patients responded to the first cycle of treatment, and 30 did not. Five patients who had not responded to the second cycle received a third one. All patients received twice the dose of the first cycle unless they experienced side effects during the first cycle. Thus, nine patients received 9 mU/w, nine received 15 mU/w, and 19 received 30 mU/w for 6 months. Complete response was defined as nondetectable hepatic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA at the end of therapy; sustained response was defined as normal ALT levels with negative serum HCV-RNA at > 6 months after cessation of therapy. Of the 30 nonresponders to the first cycle, eight responded to the second, but only four (13%) had a sustained response. Six of the seven responders to the first cycle responded to the second cycle, but only three had a sustained response (3/7, 43%) (p = NS). Although 33 and 21% (p = NS) of those who were treated with 15 mU/w and 30 mU/w, respectively, showed a sustained response, none of those treated with 9 mU/w had a sustained response (p = NS). Although age or sex of the patients studied had no effect on the response rate, liver histology was an important factor because only noncirrhotics showed a long term response (47 vs 0%; p < 0.02). There was no difference in response rate between patients with chronic active hepatitis and chronic persistent hepatitis. In conclusion, noncirrhotic patients who have not responded or responded and relapsed to a 6-month course of alpha-INF (3-5 mU three times per week) should try a second course at a dose of 15 mU/w. Retreatment may induce complete and long lasting response in 13% of the initial nonresponders and 43% of the initial responders. A second course of alpha-IFN in nonresponding cirrhotics appears ineffective in clearing the virus at the doses used.

摘要

为评估第二轮α-干扰素治疗对首轮治疗无反应或有反应但复发患者的疗效,我们对37例患者进行了再次治疗,其中男性25例,女性12例,平均年龄41岁,使用α-干扰素(IFN)。7例患者对首轮治疗有反应,30例无反应。5例对第二轮治疗无反应的患者接受了第三轮治疗。所有患者接受的剂量是首轮治疗剂量的两倍,除非他们在首轮治疗期间出现副作用。因此,9例患者接受9 mU/周,9例接受15 mU/周,19例接受30 mU/周,持续6个月。完全缓解定义为治疗结束时检测不到丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)-RNA;持续缓解定义为治疗停止后>6个月时ALT水平正常且血清HCV-RNA阴性。首轮治疗无反应的30例患者中,8例对第二轮治疗有反应,但只有4例(13%)获得持续缓解。首轮治疗有反应的7例患者中,6例对第二轮治疗有反应,但只有3例获得持续缓解(3/7,43%)(p=无显著性差异)。尽管分别接受15 mU/周和30 mU/周治疗的患者中,有33%和21%(p=无显著性差异)出现持续缓解,但接受9 mU/周治疗的患者中无一例获得持续缓解(p=无显著性差异)。尽管所研究患者的年龄或性别对缓解率无影响,但肝组织学是一个重要因素,因为只有非肝硬化患者显示出长期缓解(47%对0%;p<0.02)。慢性活动性肝炎和慢性持续性肝炎患者的缓解率无差异。总之,对6个月疗程的α-干扰素(每周3次,每次3 - 5 mU)无反应或有反应但复发的非肝硬化患者,应尝试以15 mU/周的剂量进行第二轮治疗。再次治疗可能使13%的初始无反应者和43%的初始有反应者获得完全且持久的缓解。对于无反应的肝硬化患者,使用上述剂量的第二轮α-干扰素治疗似乎无法有效清除病毒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验