Salvetti A, Virdis A, Taddei S, Ambrosoli S, Caiazza A, Gandolfi E, del Prato C, Saba G, nello Ceccarelli C, Buoninconti R, Spadari G, Kilama M O
Clinica Medica I, University of Pisa, Italy.
J Hypertens. 1996 May;14(5):661-7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199605000-00017.
To evaluate the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and retard in terms of trough:peak ratio efficacy.
According to a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, 58 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, after 1 month placebo washout, received 30 mg/day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system, 20 mg nifedipine retard twice a day and the corresponding placebos for 1 month. At the end of each treatment period, blood pressure was measured by using a mercury sphygmomanometer at trough and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the last dosing. The peak effect was identified as the maximum decrement induced by the three randomized treatments with respect to the value at the end of the placebo washout period during the 4 h interval. The trough:peak ratios of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated as group ratios and individual ratios from decrements induced by nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and retard, corrected for those induced by randomized placebo. Patients were defined as responders to each randomized treatment if their diastolic blood pressure at trough time was reduced by at least 10 mmHg relative to that at the corresponding time at the end of placebo washout.
Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and retard significantly reduced blood pressure to a similar extent both at trough and at peak. Systolic and diastolic group trough:peak ratios in responders to nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (n = 41) were 0.80 and 0.88, respectively, and those in responders to nifedipine retard (n = 30) 0.84 and 0.93, respectively. The percentage of patients with trough:peak ratios > 0.50 was > 80% (systolic trough:peak ratios) and above 90% (diastolic trough: peak ratios) for both nifedipine formulations.
Our data show that 30 mg/day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and 20 mg nifedipine retard twice a day have a favourable trough:peak ratios efficacy when given as monotherapy to essential hypertensive patients.
根据谷峰比疗效评估硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统和缓释制剂的降压效果。
按照双盲、随机、交叉设计,58例轻至中度原发性高血压患者在经过1个月的安慰剂洗脱期后,接受30毫克/天的硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统、20毫克硝苯地平缓释制剂每日两次给药,以及相应的安慰剂治疗,各为期1个月。在每个治疗期结束时,使用汞柱式血压计在谷值时以及最后一次给药后1、2、3和4小时测量血压。将峰值效应确定为三种随机治疗相对于安慰剂洗脱期结束时的值在4小时间隔内引起的最大降幅。收缩压和舒张压的谷峰比按照组比值和个体比值计算,分别由硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统和缓释制剂引起的降幅计算得出,并校正随机安慰剂引起的降幅。如果患者谷值时的舒张压相对于安慰剂洗脱期结束时相应时间降低至少10毫米汞柱,则定义为对每种随机治疗有反应。
硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统和缓释制剂在谷值和峰值时均能显著降低血压,降低程度相似。硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统的反应者(n = 41)的收缩压和舒张压组谷峰比分别为0.80和0.88,硝苯地平缓释制剂的反应者(n = 30)的收缩压和舒张压组谷峰比分别为0.84和0.93。两种硝苯地平制剂的谷峰比> 0.50的患者百分比在收缩压谷峰比方面> 80%,在舒张压谷峰比方面> 90%。
我们的数据表明,30毫克/天的硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统和20毫克硝苯地平缓释制剂每日两次给药作为原发性高血压患者的单一疗法时,具有良好的谷峰比疗效。