Suppr超能文献

对吸附破伤风疫苗和平板破伤风疫苗加强剂量的反应及抗体应答。

Reactions and antibody responses to reinforcing doses of adsorbed and plain tetanus vaccines.

作者信息

Collier L H, Polakoff S, Mortimer J

出版信息

Lancet. 1979 Jun 30;1(8131):1364-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92006-3.

Abstract

In children aged 15--16 years receiving routine reinforcement tetanus immunisation, adsorbed vaccine caused more severe and more frequent local reactions than did plain formol toxoid, and a higher incidence of pyrexia. The incidence of swelling and erythema at the inoculation site increased with serum antitoxin titre at the time of inoculation, whereas pain and tenderness were related to the presence of the aluminium hydroxide adjuvant. Both vaccines gave satisfactory antibody responses over a 5-month observation period; plain formol toxoid induced higher mean titres than did the adsorbed vaccine. It is recommended that plain and not adsorbed vaccine be used when reinforcement of immunity to tetanus alone is desired.

摘要

在15至16岁接受常规破伤风强化免疫的儿童中,吸附疫苗比普通甲醛类毒素引起更严重、更频繁的局部反应,且发热发生率更高。接种部位肿胀和红斑的发生率随接种时血清抗毒素滴度的升高而增加,而疼痛和压痛与氢氧化铝佐剂的存在有关。在5个月的观察期内,两种疫苗均产生了令人满意的抗体反应;普通甲醛类毒素诱导的平均滴度高于吸附疫苗。建议在仅希望强化破伤风免疫力时使用普通疫苗而非吸附疫苗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验