Teears R J, Barnes B A, Batsakis J G, Bloch D M
Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;68(1 Suppl):159-61.
The results of the 1975 CAP Comprehensive Chemistry Survey of serum magnesium are presented. More than 1,260 laboratories participated in this survey. The most commonly used method for the measurement of serum magnesium concentrations is atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Colorimetric dye methods (Rapid-Stat (TM) kits, the Dupont ACA and titan yellow) follow in popularity. Variation in precision was lowest with atomic absorption and highest with titan yellow methods. All three of the dye-binding methods demonstrated either consistently negative or consistently positive biases when compared with the weighted mean concentration. The differences between the mean concentrations obtained by the dye-binding methods and atomic absorption spectrophotometry are statistically analyzed, and several conclusions are presented. As demonstrated by this survey and at the concentrations measured, the estimation of serum magnesium by any of the commonly used methods, except titan yellow, is clinically appropriate.
本文呈现了1975年CAP血清镁综合化学调查的结果。超过1260家实验室参与了此次调查。测量血清镁浓度最常用的方法是原子吸收分光光度法。比色染料法(Rapid-Stat (TM)试剂盒、杜邦ACA和钛黄法)次之。精密度的差异以原子吸收法最低,钛黄法最高。与加权平均浓度相比,所有三种染料结合法均显示出持续的负偏差或正偏差。对染料结合法和原子吸收分光光度法获得的平均浓度差异进行了统计分析,并给出了若干结论。正如本次调查所表明的,在所测浓度下,除钛黄法外,任何常用方法对血清镁的估计在临床上都是合适的。