Bor Y C, Miller M D, Bushman F D, Orgel L E
Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, California 92186-5800, USA.
Virology. 1996 Aug 1;222(1):283-8. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0422.
Integration of reverse transcribed retroviral cDNA is not restricted to particular host DNA sequences. However, the frequency of integration into a particular phosphodiester bond is influenced by the local sequence. Here we examine the target-sequence preferences of purified HIV integrase and viral nucleoprotein complexes (preintegration complexes) isolated from freshly infected cells. We find that the three-base sequence including the integration site is not the major factor determining the frequency of integration, since identical triplets embedded in different sequences are used with very different efficiencies. However, there is a statistically significant bias against integration upstream of a pyrimidine nucleotide. The target-sequence preferences of purified integrase and preintegration complexes are very different. Strong integration sites on opposite DNA strands occur in pairs separated by five residues when preintegration complexes are used but not with purified integrase. These studies highlight the difference between the two sources of HIV integration activity and may provide the basis for a simple assay for the correct assembly of viral nucleoprotein complexes.
逆转录逆转录病毒cDNA的整合并不局限于特定的宿主DNA序列。然而,整合到特定磷酸二酯键的频率受局部序列的影响。在这里,我们研究了从新鲜感染细胞中分离出的纯化HIV整合酶和病毒核蛋白复合物(预整合复合物)的靶序列偏好。我们发现,包含整合位点的三碱基序列不是决定整合频率的主要因素,因为嵌入不同序列中的相同三联体使用效率非常不同。然而,在嘧啶核苷酸上游进行整合存在统计学上显著的偏向性。纯化的整合酶和预整合复合物的靶序列偏好非常不同。当使用预整合复合物时,相反DNA链上的强整合位点以相隔五个残基的成对形式出现,但使用纯化的整合酶时则不会。这些研究突出了HIV整合活性的两种来源之间的差异,并可能为病毒核蛋白复合物的正确组装提供一种简单检测方法的基础。