Suppr超能文献

闭孔器框架的旋转锁定设计考量

Swing-lock design considerations for obturator frameworks.

作者信息

Parr G R, Gardner L K

机构信息

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Nov;74(5):503-11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80353-1.

Abstract

The conventional and swing-lock (S/L) obturator prostheses can be highly effective in restoring maxillary defects when careful attention is paid to the principles of framework design. Although the S/L modality has been available since the mid 1960s, its use in maxillofacial prosthetics has been limited, and little information is available in the literature to guide the practitioner. This modality offers a conservative design option that lies somewhere between the conventionally designed obturator prosthesis and the prosthesis designed to use extensive fixed reconstruction or endosseous implants. When the S/L obturator is considered, single, double, or dual labial bar designs are possible and may be required by the length and complexities of the arc of closure. Such designs provide a flexible labial bar that transmits less stress to abutment teeth. This article reviewed conventional obturator framework designs and compared them with S/L designs for similar patient categories.

摘要

如果在框架设计原则上予以充分关注,传统型和旋转锁扣(S/L)式阻塞器假体在修复上颌骨缺损方面可具有很高的有效性。尽管S/L模式自20世纪60年代中期就已出现,但其在颌面修复中的应用一直有限,而且文献中几乎没有可指导从业者的信息。这种模式提供了一种保守的设计选择,介于传统设计的阻塞器假体与旨在采用广泛固定重建或骨内种植体的假体之间。在考虑使用S/L阻塞器时,单唇杆、双唇杆或双唇杆设计都是可行的,并且可能因闭合弧的长度和复杂性而需要采用这些设计。此类设计提供了一种灵活的唇杆,可减少对基牙的应力传递。本文回顾了传统阻塞器框架设计,并将其与针对类似患者类别的S/L设计进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验