Fylstra D L, Carter J F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
J Reprod Med. 1996 Jul;41(7):497-503.
To demonstrate, in a university hospital setting, that the introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy reduced the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increased resident experience in vaginal surgery.
All hysterectomies performed for benign gynecologic disease during one year, 1993-1994, at the Medical University of South Carolina Hospital, Charleston, after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy were compared to those performed in preceding years, 1990-1993.
Prior to 1993, > 70% of hysterectomies at the Medical University of South Carolina Hospital were performed abdominally. With the introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, from a total of 155 hysterectomies performed in 1993-1994, the percentage of hysterectomies performed abdominally decreased to 39 without affecting the overall percentage of traditional vaginal hysterectomies, 29. Since laparoscopic hysterectomies were completed with a significant vaginal component to the operation, the actual resident experience with vaginal hysterectomy increased to 61% of hysterectomies. Straightforward vaginal hysterectomies were performed on patients with higher parity and traditional indications, such as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and prolapse. Patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy were not considered candidates for traditional vaginal hysterectomy and had significantly fewer complications and hospital days but did have significantly smaller uteri and greater hospital charges than did patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy (P < .05). No significant difference was found for length of operating time or blood loss between each method of hysterectomy.
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, when used as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in patients not considered candidates for vaginal hysterectomy, decreased the need for abdominal hysterectomy, with fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay and increased resident experience with vaginal surgery.
在大学医院环境中证明,腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的引入减少了腹式子宫切除术的需求,并增加了住院医师在阴道手术方面的经验。
将1993 - 1994年在南卡罗来纳医科大学医院(查尔斯顿)引入腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术后,因良性妇科疾病进行的所有子宫切除术,与1990 - 1993年之前几年进行的子宫切除术进行比较。
1993年之前,南卡罗来纳医科大学医院超过70%的子宫切除术是通过腹部进行的。随着腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的引入,在1993 - 1994年共进行的155例子宫切除术中,腹部子宫切除术的比例降至39%,而传统阴式子宫切除术的总体比例(29%)未受影响。由于腹腔镜子宫切除术在手术中有显著的阴道部分,住院医师实际进行阴式子宫切除术的经验增加到子宫切除术的61%。直接阴式子宫切除术针对多产且有传统适应证的患者进行,如宫颈上皮内瘤变和脱垂患者。接受腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的患者不被视为传统阴式子宫切除术的候选者,其并发症和住院天数明显较少,但子宫明显较小,住院费用明显高于接受腹式子宫切除术的患者(P <.05)。每种子宫切除方法在手术时间长度或失血量方面未发现显著差异。
对于不被视为阴式子宫切除术候选者的患者,腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术作为腹式子宫切除术的替代方法,减少了腹式子宫切除术的需求,并发症更少,住院时间更短,并增加了住院医师在阴道手术方面的经验。