Ristic H, Wiley J W, Hall K E, Sima A A
Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbon 48103, USA.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996 May;32(3):135-40. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(96)01250-8.
It has been suggested that L-type Ca2+ channel antagonists exert a beneficial effect on nerve conduction velocity (NCV) slowing in short-term experimental diabetic neuropathy. We examined the effects of long-term treatment with the L-channel blocker, nimodipine, on two aspects of neuronal function previously documented to be abnormal in the spontaneously diabetic BB/W-rat: nerve conduction velocity and calcium influx in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Treatment with 20 mg/kg nimodipine i.p. every 48 h from onset of diabetes for 6 months led to a transient, non-significant (30%) improvement in NCV. Intervention with the same regimen from 3 to 6 months of diabetes had no corrective effect on the already established NCV defect. Voltage activated calcium currents were recorded in isolated DRG neurons from nimodipine-treated and untreated diabetic and non-diabetic age-matched BB/W control rats. The peak high-threshold calcium current density (IDCa, pA/pF) was significantly larger in non-treated diabetic rats compared with control rats (157 +/- 12 vs. 66 +/- 5.5 (P < or = 0.05)). Long-term treatment with nimodipine was associated with a non-significant (28%) decrease (112 +/- 29) in the IDCa compared with non-treated diabetic rats. We conclude that L-channel mediated perturbations of cytosolic Ca2+ levels are only of minor pathophysiologic significance in the development of chronic diabetic neuropathy.
有人提出,L型钙通道拮抗剂对短期实验性糖尿病性神经病变中神经传导速度(NCV)减慢具有有益作用。我们研究了L通道阻滞剂尼莫地平长期治疗对自发性糖尿病BB/W大鼠先前记录的神经元功能两个异常方面的影响:神经传导速度和背根神经节(DRG)神经元中的钙内流。从糖尿病发病开始,每48小时腹腔注射20mg/kg尼莫地平,持续6个月,导致NCV出现短暂的、无统计学意义(30%)的改善。在糖尿病3至6个月时采用相同方案进行干预,对已经存在的NCV缺陷没有纠正作用。在来自尼莫地平治疗和未治疗的糖尿病及非糖尿病年龄匹配的BB/W对照大鼠的分离DRG神经元中记录电压激活钙电流。与对照大鼠相比,未治疗的糖尿病大鼠的峰值高阈值钙电流密度(IDCa,pA/pF)显著更大(157±12对66±5.5(P≤0.05))。与未治疗的糖尿病大鼠相比,尼莫地平长期治疗使IDCa出现无统计学意义(28%)的降低(112±29)。我们得出结论,L通道介导的细胞溶质Ca2+水平扰动在慢性糖尿病性神经病变的发展中仅具有较小的病理生理意义。