Alcázar J L, Ruiz-Perez M L, Errasti T
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;8(2):114-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08020114.x.
The aim of this study was to establish which of several commonly used parameters performs best in the evaluation of adnexal masses by transvaginal color Doppler sonography. A total of 79 adnexal masses in 73 consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 43 (58.9%) premenopausal and 30 (41.1%) postmenopausal patients. The median age was 45 years (range 20-78 years). The parameters compared were: number of vessels detected in each tumor, tumor vessel location (central vs. peripheral), peak systolic velocity (PSV), lowest resistance index (RIlowest), mean resistance index (RImean), lowest pulsatility index (PIlowest) and mean pulsatility index (PImean). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the test performance of the parameters, except for tumor vessel location, and to estimate the best cut-off value of the parameters studied to differentiate between malignant and benign tumors. Definitive histopathological diagnosis was obtained in every case and used as the 'gold standard'. There were 20 (25.3%) malignant and 59 (74.7%) benign masses. Color Doppler signals were detected in 100% of the malignant masses (20 out of 20) and 74.6% (44 out of 59) of the benign masses, and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Tumor vessel location was central in 18 out of 20 (90%) malignant masses, whereas it was peripheral in 39 out of 44 (88.6%) benign masses. ROC analysis showed that the best cut-off values for number of vessels, PSV, RIlowest, RImean, PIlowest and PImean were three vessels, 25 cm/s, 0.45, 0.55, 0.90 and 1.50, respectively. However, for all these parameters except RIlowest, there was a considerable overlap between benign and malignant tumors, with a high false-positive rate. In conclusion, in our experience, the parameters that performed best were the RIlowest with a cut-off value of 0.45 (sensitivity 100%; false-positive rate 11.4%) and central tumor vessel location (sensitivity 90%; false-positive rate 11.4%).
本研究的目的是确定在经阴道彩色多普勒超声评估附件包块时,几种常用参数中哪一个表现最佳。本研究纳入了73例连续患者的79个附件包块。其中有43例(58.9%)绝经前患者和30例(41.1%)绝经后患者。中位年龄为45岁(范围20 - 78岁)。所比较的参数有:每个肿瘤中检测到的血管数量、肿瘤血管位置(中央型与周边型)、收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、最低阻力指数(RIlowest)、平均阻力指数(RImean)、最低搏动指数(PIlowest)和平均搏动指数(PImean)。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以分析除肿瘤血管位置外各参数的检测性能,并估计所研究参数区分恶性和良性肿瘤的最佳截断值。每例均获得了明确的组织病理学诊断并用作“金标准”。有20个(25.3%)恶性包块和59个(74.7%)良性包块。100%的恶性包块(20个中的20个)检测到彩色多普勒信号,74.6%(59个中的44个)的良性包块检测到彩色多普勒信号,差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。20个恶性包块中有18个(90%)肿瘤血管位置为中央型,而44个良性包块中有39个(88.6%)肿瘤血管位置为周边型。ROC分析表明,血管数量、PSV、RIlowest、RImean、PIlowest和PImean的最佳截断值分别为3条血管、25 cm/s、0.45、0.55、0.90和1.50。然而,除RIlowest外,所有这些参数在良性和恶性肿瘤之间都有相当大的重叠,假阳性率较高。总之,根据我们的经验,表现最佳的参数是截断值为0.45的RIlowest(敏感性100%;假阳性率11.4%)和肿瘤血管中央位置(敏感性90%;假阳性率11.4%)。