Wallace B, Allen P A, Propper R E
Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, OH 44115, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1996 Oct;44(4):324-37. doi: 10.1080/00207149608416096.
Anagram-solving activity was examined as a function of hypnotic susceptibility level and imaging ability. In Experiment 1, anagrams that were composed of sets of letters that formed actual words (word anagrams), but when unscrambled formed other words, were compared to sets of letters that formed nonwords (nonsense anagrams). Word anagrams required more time to solve than nonsense anagrams. Also, fewer word anagrams were correctly solved compared to nonsense anagrams. Those individuals judged both high in hypnotic susceptibility and vivid in imaging ability demonstrated the best performance. In Experiment 2, anagrams that when unscrambled formed high-imagery words were compared to those that formed low-imagery words. High-imagery-word anagrams were solved more quickly and correctly than low-imagery-word anagrams. Such activity was best demonstrated by individuals who were judged to be both high in hypnotic susceptibility and vivid in imaging ability. These results are discussed in terms of strategies for solving anagrams and the individual differences that appear to be associated with using such strategies.
对解字谜活动进行了研究,该活动是作为催眠易感性水平和成像能力的函数。在实验1中,由能组成实际单词的字母组构成的字谜(单词字谜),但在解出后形成其他单词,与由不能组成单词的字母组构成的字谜(无意义字谜)进行了比较。解单词字谜比解无意义字谜需要更多时间。而且,与无意义字谜相比,正确解出的单词字谜更少。那些被判定为催眠易感性高且成像能力生动的个体表现出最佳成绩。在实验2中,将解出后形成高意象单词的字谜与形成低意象单词的字谜进行了比较。高意象单词字谜比低意象单词字谜解得更快且更正确。这种活动在那些被判定为催眠易感性高且成像能力生动的个体中表现得最为明显。根据解字谜的策略以及似乎与使用此类策略相关的个体差异对这些结果进行了讨论。