Suppr超能文献

“唯一可行的手段”。五角大楼与《纽伦堡法典》的矛盾关系。

"The only feasible means." The Pentagon's ambivalent relationship with the Nuremberg Code.

作者信息

Moreno J D

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):11-9.

PMID:8891703
Abstract

Convinced that armed conflict with the Soviet Union was all but inevitable, that such conflict would involve unconventional atomic, biological, and chemical warfare, and that research with human subjects was essential to respond to the threat, in the early 1950s the U.S. Department of Defense promulgated a policy governing human experimentation based on the Nuremberg Code. Yet the policymaking process focused on the abstract issue of whether human experiments should go forward at all, ignoring the reality of humans subjects research already under way and leaving unanswered ethical questions about how to conduct such research. Documents newly released to the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments tell the story of the Pentagon policy.

摘要

美国国防部确信与苏联的武装冲突几乎不可避免,这种冲突将涉及非常规的原子、生物和化学战,并且认为人体实验研究对于应对这一威胁至关重要。于是在20世纪50年代初,美国国防部根据《纽伦堡法典》颁布了一项关于人体实验的政策。然而,决策过程聚焦于人体实验是否应该进行这一抽象问题,忽视了当时已经在进行的人体实验研究的现实情况,并且对于如何开展此类研究的伦理问题也未给出答案。新近向人类辐射实验咨询委员会公开的文件讲述了五角大楼政策的故事。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验