Suppr超能文献

静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合:颈内静脉近端置管的影响

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the effects of proximal internal jugular cannulation.

作者信息

Finer N N, Tierney A J, Ainsworth W

机构信息

Department of Newborn Medicine, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Oct;31(10):1391-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90836-2.

Abstract

Venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using a double lumen catheter has become an accepted method of providing ECMO support for critically ill newborn infants. In addition, use of the cephalic jugular catheter can provide augmented venous blood flow, potentially prevent increased cerebral venous pressure, maintain cerebral venous blood flow, and increase ECMO oxygen delivery. The authors compared their experience using VV double-lumen (VVDL) ECMO with a cephalic jugular catheter with their previous experience using venoarterial (VA) ECMO. They compared 15 infants who had meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) and 12 who had congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) treated with VVDL ECMO with a cephalic jugular catheter with the same number of infants with each condition treated with VA ECMO (historical controls). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to birth weights, oxygen indexes before ECMO, of ECMO flows at 4 and 24 hours. For infants with MAS treated with VVDL ECMO, the overall duration of ECMO support was significantly shorter (63 hours VVDLv 118 hours VA; P = .001), and the average cephalic flow was 33 mL/kg for infants treated with VVDL support. For infants with CDH, there were no differences in any of the variables evaluated, including total duration (100 hours VVDLv 128 hours VA; P = .06 [NS]), and the average cephalic flow was 39 mL/kg for infants treated with VVDL support. The venous oxygen content was significantly lower in infants with MAS treated with VVDL ECMO than for historical controls treated with VA ECMO at 4 hours of ECMO support (15.8 v 16.7; P < or = .05). No other significant differences were noted for any of the calculated oxygen transport variables comparing VVDL with VA ECMO infants with CDH treated with VVDL ECMO were extubated sooner than those treated with VA ECMO (10.3 days VVDL v 15.4 days VA; P = 048). In addition, there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications or death. This experience suggests that VVDL ECMO using a cephalic jugular catheter results in shorter ECMO runs and provides support that is comparable to VA ECMO for infants with CDH and MAS while avoiding carotid artery cannulation and ligation.

摘要

使用双腔导管的静脉-静脉(VV)体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)已成为为危重新生儿提供ECMO支持的一种公认方法。此外,使用头臂静脉导管可增加静脉血流量,有可能防止脑静脉压升高,维持脑静脉血流,并增加ECMO的氧输送量。作者将他们使用带头臂静脉导管的VV双腔(VVDL)ECMO的经验与之前使用静脉-动脉(VA)ECMO的经验进行了比较。他们将15例患有胎粪吸入综合征(MAS)和12例患有先天性膈疝(CDH)且接受带头臂静脉导管的VVDL ECMO治疗的婴儿,与相同数量的患有每种疾病且接受VA ECMO治疗的婴儿(历史对照)进行了比较。两组在出生体重、ECMO前的氧指数以及4小时和24小时的ECMO流量方面无显著差异。对于接受VVDL ECMO治疗的MAS婴儿,ECMO支持的总持续时间显著缩短(VVDL为63小时,VA为118小时;P = 0.001),接受VVDL支持的婴儿平均头臂血流量为33 mL/kg。对于患有CDH的婴儿,所评估的任何变量均无差异,包括总持续时间(VVDL为100小时,VA为128小时;P = 0.06[无统计学意义]),接受VVDL支持的婴儿平均头臂血流量为39 mL/kg。在ECMO支持4小时时,接受VVDL ECMO治疗的MAS婴儿的静脉氧含量显著低于接受VA ECMO治疗的历史对照婴儿(15.8对16.7;P≤0.05)。在比较VVDL与VA ECMO时,对于任何计算得出的氧输送变量,未发现其他显著差异。接受VVDL ECMO治疗的CDH婴儿比接受VA ECMO治疗的婴儿拔管更早(VVDL为10.3天,VA为15.4天;P = 0.048)。此外,并发症或死亡的总体发生率无显著差异。这一经验表明,使用头臂静脉导管的VVDL ECMO可缩短ECMO运行时间,并为患有CDH和MAS的婴儿提供与VA ECMO相当的支持,同时避免颈动脉插管和结扎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验