Bernstein S H, Christiansen N P, Fay J P, Brown R, Herzig R, Frankel S, Blumenson L, Herzig G P
Department of Hematological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
Exp Hematol. 1996 Oct;24(12):1363-8.
Given the limitations of bone marrow transplantation (BMT), alternative approaches to deliver dose-intensive regimens without stem cell support are needed. Administration of hematopoietic growth factors before high-dose chemotherapy (priming) may reduce myelosuppression directly, delaying the onset of neutropenia by expanding the mature neutrophil compartment, and shortening the duration of neutropenia by expanding progenitor cell mass. Priming may also render progenitor populations mitotically quiescent after growth factors are withdrawn, thereby making them less sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. It is also possible, however, that growth factor priming may worsen aplasia when used with dose-intensive regimens by either depleting early progenitor pools or recruiting progenitor populations into cycle. To determine the safety and hematopoietic efficacy of growth factor priming, 13 patients with hematologic malignancy or breast cancer were treated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (250 micrograms/m2 twice daily subcutaneously) until the white blood cell (WBC) count reached either a plateau or 100,000 cells/microL. Forty-eight hours after the last dose of GM-CSF, chemotherapy was begun using high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide. All patients received GM-CSF after chemotherapy. Two patients were withdrawn during GM-CSF priming because they developed urticarial rashes. The maximum median increases in WBC and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) during GM-CSF priming were 7.1- and 4.4-fold, respectively. Only one patient achieved the original target WBC of 100,000/microL. The kinetics of leukocyte expansion were slow; a median of 13 days was needed to reach the maximum WBC. Furthermore, much of the leukocyte expansion was caused by an increase in eosinophils, which would not be expected to accelerate hematopoietic recovery. GM-CSF priming did not appear to have a significant impact on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide, as there was no significant difference in 1) recovery to an ANC > 500/microL compared to a historical control group that received no growth factor (median of 29 and 30 days, respectively; p = 0.4), 2) number of days with an ANC < 500/microL (median of 19 and 20 days, respectively; p = 0.11), and 3) number of days to an untransfused platelet count > or = 50,000/microL (median 36 and 32 days, respectively; p = 0.23). The failure of GM-CSF priming may be a result of its modest stimulation of hematopoiesis or the expansion of a committed progenitor cell population that is exquisitely sensitive to this regimen.
鉴于骨髓移植(BMT)存在局限性,需要有替代方法来在无干细胞支持的情况下给予剂量密集型方案。在高剂量化疗前给予造血生长因子(预激)可能直接减轻骨髓抑制,通过扩大成熟中性粒细胞池延迟中性粒细胞减少的发生,并通过扩大祖细胞群缩短中性粒细胞减少的持续时间。预激还可能使祖细胞群体在生长因子撤除后进入有丝分裂静止期,从而使其对化疗的细胞毒性作用不那么敏感。然而,也有可能生长因子预激与剂量密集型方案联用时,通过耗尽早期祖细胞池或使祖细胞群体进入细胞周期而加重再生障碍。为了确定生长因子预激的安全性和造血功效,13例血液系统恶性肿瘤或乳腺癌患者接受了粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)治疗(250微克/平方米,每日两次皮下注射),直至白细胞(WBC)计数达到平台期或100,000个细胞/微升。在最后一剂GM-CSF后48小时,开始使用高剂量依托泊苷和环磷酰胺进行化疗。所有患者在化疗后均接受GM-CSF治疗。2例患者在GM-CSF预激期间因出现荨麻疹样皮疹而退出。GM-CSF预激期间WBC和绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)的最大中位数增加分别为7.1倍和4.4倍。只有1例患者达到了最初设定的100,000/微升的WBC目标。白细胞扩增的动力学缓慢;达到最大WBC中位数需要13天。此外,白细胞扩增的大部分是由嗜酸性粒细胞增加引起的,而这并不预期会加速造血恢复。GM-CSF预激似乎对高剂量依托泊苷和环磷酰胺后的造血恢复没有显著影响,因为在以下方面没有显著差异:1)与未接受生长因子的历史对照组相比,恢复到ANC>500/微升的情况(中位数分别为29天和30天;p = 0.4),2)ANC<500/微升的天数(中位数分别为19天和20天;p = 0.11),以及3)未输血血小板计数>或=50,000/微升的天数(中位数分别为36天和32天;p = 0.23)。GM-CSF预激失败可能是由于其对造血的适度刺激或对该方案极度敏感的定向祖细胞群体的扩增所致。