Henderson B, Poole S, Wilson M
Maxillofacial Surgery Research Unit Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University College London, UK.
Immunopharmacology. 1996 Oct;35(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/0162-3109(96)00144-0.
The interacting cellular and molecular systems which we classify as immunity and inflammation evolved to protect the organism from exogenous parasites including viruses and bacteria. Cytokines play a pivotal, but paradoxical, role both in immunity and inflammation. These local peptide hormone-like molecules form a major arm of the organisms, defenses against infectious microorganisms but they are also implicated as potent mediators of the pathology of infectious diseases. The apparently lethal effects of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor in experimental septic shock testify to the latter. In the current paradigm, cytokine induction, as a protective or pathological mechanism, is a direct response to the presence of infectious microorganisms. Evidence is now accumulating that cytokines play a much more complex role in the interplay between exogenous microorganisms and the host. For example, it has been established that viruses have evolved pro-active methods of subverting the cytokine network by producing: (i) soluble cytokine receptors which bind and inactivate cytokines, (ii) immunomodulatory cytokine homologues, and (iii) ICE inhibitors. The possibility exists that the major role of these 'viral cytokines' is to neutralize certain host responses. Recent cytokine transgenic knockouts demonstrate that the normal benign response to commensal gut microflora becomes a lethal inflammatory state in the absence of the cytokines interleukin 2 or interleukin 10. The human body contains an enormous number of microorganisms which constitute the normal microflora. It is estimated that the average human contains 10(13) eukaryotic cells but 10(14) bacteria. We propose that the ability of the multicellular organism to live harmoniously with its commensal microflora must depend on mutual signalling involving eukaryotic cytokines and prokaryotic cytokine-like molecules. Such interactive signalling sets up non-inflammatory cytokine networks in tissues which form the background on which responses to infectious microorganisms must be built and related. The capacity of bacteria to induce cytokine synthesis was believed to be due to a small number of components, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is only active as a complex with host factors (lipopolysaccharide binding protein and CD14). However, it is now clear that bacteria contain and produce a large number of diverse molecules which can selectively induce the synthesis of both pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory cytokines. Many toxins are potent inducers of cytokine release or synthesis and some can inhibit LPS-induced cell activation. We have introduced the term bacteriokine to describe these bacterial cytokine inducers. The question that has to be addressed therefore is - who controls the cytokine network (eukaryotic or prokaryotic cells) and how is it controlled? It is proposed that an understanding of this question will bring with it an understanding of how to control the pathological inflammatory response and may allow the development of truly effective anti-inflammatory agents.
我们归类为免疫和炎症的相互作用的细胞及分子系统,是为保护机体免受包括病毒和细菌在内的外源寄生虫侵害而进化形成的。细胞因子在免疫和炎症中发挥着关键但又矛盾的作用。这些局部的肽类激素样分子构成了机体抵御感染性微生物防御机制的主要部分,但它们也被认为是传染病病理过程的有力介质。白细胞介素-1和肿瘤坏死因子在实验性脓毒症休克中明显的致死效应就证明了这一点。在当前的模式中,细胞因子的诱导作为一种保护或病理机制,是对感染性微生物存在的直接反应。现在越来越多的证据表明,细胞因子在外源微生物与宿主的相互作用中发挥着更为复杂的作用。例如,已经证实病毒通过产生以下物质进化出了主动破坏细胞因子网络的方法:(i)结合并使细胞因子失活的可溶性细胞因子受体,(ii)免疫调节性细胞因子同源物,以及(iii)ICE抑制剂。这些“病毒细胞因子”的主要作用可能是中和某些宿主反应。最近的细胞因子转基因敲除实验表明,在缺乏白细胞介素2或白细胞介素10的情况下,对共生肠道微生物群的正常良性反应会变成致死性炎症状态。人体含有大量构成正常微生物群的微生物。据估计,人类平均含有10¹³个真核细胞,但有10¹⁴个细菌。我们提出,多细胞生物与其共生微生物群和谐共存的能力必定依赖于涉及真核细胞因子和原核细胞因子样分子的相互信号传导。这种相互作用的信号传导在组织中建立起非炎症性细胞因子网络,形成了应对感染性微生物反应的基础并与之相关。细菌诱导细胞因子合成的能力曾被认为是由于少数几种成分,如脂多糖(LPS),它只有与宿主因子(脂多糖结合蛋白和CD14)形成复合物时才具有活性。然而,现在很清楚的是,细菌含有并能产生大量不同的分子,这些分子可以选择性地诱导促炎和免疫调节/抗炎细胞因子的合成。许多毒素是细胞因子释放或合成的强力诱导剂,有些还能抑制LPS诱导的细胞活化。我们引入了“细菌因子”这一术语来描述这些细菌细胞因子诱导剂。因此必须解决的问题是——谁控制细胞因子网络(真核细胞还是原核细胞)以及如何控制?有人提出,对这个问题的理解将带来对如何控制病理性炎症反应的理解,并可能有助于开发真正有效的抗炎药物。