Fenelon G, Elvas L, D'avila A, Tsakonas K, Malacky T, Manios E, Geelen P, Declerck L, Ramchurn H, De Vusser P
Cardiovascular Research and Teaching Institute Aalst, Cardiovascular Center, O.L.V. Hospital, Belgium.
Acta Cardiol. 1995;50(6):397-410.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 302 consecutive patients with drug refractory atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. Fast pathway ablation was attempted in 167 patients and was successful in 161 patients (96.4%). At a mean follow-up of 24 +/- 12 months, there were 21 tachycardia recurrences (12.5%). A second fast pathway ablation was attempted in 17 patients and was successful in all but 1 patient. Permanent complete AV block occurred in 12 patients (7.2%). Among the latter, late AV block was noted in 5 patients. Final success without pacemaker implantation was accomplished in 151 patients (90.4%). Slow pathway was attempted in 135 patients and was successful in 130 patients (96.3%). Three patients in whom slow pathway ablation failed underwent successful fast pathway ablation during the same session. At a mean follow-up of 14 +/- 11 months, there were 16 tachycardia recurrences (11.8%). A second slow pathway ablation was attempted in 16 patients and was successful in all but 1 patient. Permanent complete AV block occurred in 3 patients (2.2%). An additional patient developed 2 : 1 AV block during exercise, 3 months after ablation. Final success without pacemaker implantation was achieved in 129 patients (95.5%). Fast and slow pathway ablation had similar success and recurrence rates, procedure and fluoroscopy times, and number of radiofrequency pulses. However, the incidence of permanent complete AV block was higher following fast pathway ablation (p = 0.049). Although equally effective, slow pathway ablation is safer than fast pathway ablation, therefore, should be the first choice approach for treatment of AV node reentrant tachycardia.
对302例药物难治性房室结折返性心动过速患者连续进行了射频导管消融术。对167例患者尝试进行快径路消融,其中161例成功(96.4%)。平均随访24±12个月时,有21例心动过速复发(12.5%)。对17例患者尝试进行第二次快径路消融,除1例患者外其余均成功。12例患者发生永久性完全性房室传导阻滞(7.2%)。在后者中,5例患者出现晚期房室传导阻滞。151例患者最终成功且未植入起搏器(90.4%)。对135例患者尝试进行慢径路消融,其中130例成功(96.3%)。3例慢径路消融失败的患者在同一次手术中成功进行了快径路消融。平均随访14±11个月时,有16例心动过速复发(11.8%)。对16例患者尝试进行第二次慢径路消融,除1例患者外其余均成功。3例患者发生永久性完全性房室传导阻滞(2.2%)。1例患者在消融后3个月运动时出现2∶1房室传导阻滞。129例患者最终成功且未植入起搏器(95.5%)。快径路和慢径路消融的成功率、复发率、手术及透视时间以及射频脉冲数量相似。然而,快径路消融后永久性完全性房室传导阻滞的发生率更高(p = 0.049)。虽然同样有效,但慢径路消融比快径路消融更安全,因此,应作为治疗房室结折返性心动过速的首选方法。