Byun Y, Wang T, Kim J S, Yang V C
College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1065, USA.
ASAIO J. 1996 Sep-Oct;42(5):M782-7. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199609000-00096.
The authors previously reported an approach that could be used to simultaneously control both heparin and protamine induced complications during extracorporeal perfusion. The approach consists of placing a hollow fiber based bio-reactor containing immobilized protamine (defined as the "protamine bio-reactor") at the distal end of the blood perfusion circuit for extracorporeal heparin removal. Preliminary in vitro and in vivo studies have successfully demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed approach. The authors present an in vivo theoretical model for this extracorporeal heparin removal approach. This model, which consists of a two compartment model for the metabolic clearance of heparin and a plug flow reactor model for the protamine bio-reactor, can be used to optimize and assess the required size of the bio-reactor for effective clinical heparin removal. To examine the utility of such a model, 14 female mongrel dogs (six dogs were used as controls and eight dogs were used to test the bio-reactor) were included in the in vivo study. The femoral artery and femoral vein of the dog were cannulated, and the bio-reactor was attached. Heparin was given intravenously at a dose of 150 IU/kg body weight, and its activity was measured using the aPTT assay. Preliminary studies show that the experimental data fits remarkably well with the theoretical model. The model indicates that the protamine bio-reactor can remove heparin efficiently, even in the presence of competitive binding between heparin and plasma proteins. Under clinical situations, such as hemodialysis and open heart operations, a protamine bio-reactor containing approximately 45,000 hollow fibers is necessary to reduce heparin to less than 10% of its initial concentration. The time required to saturate the protamine bio-reactor with heparin is dependent upon the blood flow rate which, as predicted by the model, is 10 min for open heart surgery (flow rate = 2,000 ml/min) and 60 min for hemodialysis (flow rate = 200 ml/min). A detailed description of the in vivo model, as well as future directions envisioned in the design of a clinically useful heparin removing system are discussed.
作者之前报道了一种可用于在体外灌注期间同时控制肝素和鱼精蛋白所致并发症的方法。该方法包括在血液灌注回路远端放置一个含有固定化鱼精蛋白的中空纤维生物反应器(定义为“鱼精蛋白生物反应器”),用于体外清除肝素。初步的体外和体内研究已成功证明了该方法的可行性。作者提出了一种用于这种体外肝素清除方法的体内理论模型。该模型由一个用于肝素代谢清除的双室模型和一个用于鱼精蛋白生物反应器的活塞流反应器模型组成,可用于优化和评估有效临床清除肝素所需的生物反应器大小。为了检验这种模型的实用性,14只雌性杂种犬(6只犬作为对照,8只犬用于测试生物反应器)被纳入体内研究。将犬的股动脉和股静脉插管,并连接生物反应器。以150 IU/kg体重的剂量静脉给予肝素,并使用活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)测定法测量其活性。初步研究表明,实验数据与理论模型拟合得非常好。该模型表明,即使在肝素与血浆蛋白之间存在竞争性结合的情况下,鱼精蛋白生物反应器也能有效清除肝素。在临床情况(如血液透析和心脏直视手术)下,需要一个含有约45,000根中空纤维的鱼精蛋白生物反应器才能将肝素降低至其初始浓度的10%以下。鱼精蛋白生物反应器被肝素饱和所需的时间取决于血流速度,正如模型所预测的,心脏直视手术时为10分钟(血流速度 = 2000 ml/min),血液透析时为60分钟(血流速度 = 200 ml/min)。文中讨论了体内模型的详细描述以及在设计临床上有用的肝素清除系统中设想的未来方向。