Nogami A, Takahashi A, Naito S, Tsuchio Y, Oshima S, Taniguchi K, Nitta J, Aonuma K, Iesaka Y
Second Cardiovascular Division, Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 2):1972-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03264.x.
The mechanism of cure in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by catheter ablation has not been fully clarified. We hypothesized that disruption of a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways is responsible for the elimination of tachycardia.
AVNRT was eliminated in 20 patients by catheter ablation. In five patients (25%; group I) slow pathway conduction disappeared 1 week after ablation. In six patients (30%; group II), the effective refractory period of the slow pathway was prolonged by more than 50 ms (212 +/- 81 ms vs 340 +/- 81 ms; P < 0.05). In the remaining nine patients (45%; group III), there was no change in the refractory period (270 +/- 65 ms vs 273 +/- 74 ms), although tachycardia was not inducible. A shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways was examined by comparing the A-H intervals over the slow pathway during the tachycardia and during atrial pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. Prior to ablation, a shortcut link was assumed in 1 of group I patients, 2 of group II patients, and 8 of group III patients. Of the 9 patients in whom the slow pathway was not impaired after ablation (group III), 8 patients were found to have a shortcut link, while 8 of 11 patients with impairment of the slow pathway after ablation (groups I and II) had no shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways (P < 0.05).
In patients with a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways, slow pathway conduction itself does not need to be impaired to eliminate the AVNRT, whereas in patients without this shortcut link, slow pathway conduction must be impaired.
导管消融治疗房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的治愈机制尚未完全阐明。我们推测,快慢径路之间的捷径连接中断是消除心动过速的原因。
20例患者通过导管消融消除了AVNRT。5例患者(25%;第I组)在消融后1周慢径路传导消失。6例患者(30%;第II组),慢径路的有效不应期延长超过50毫秒(212±81毫秒对340±81毫秒;P<0.05)。其余9例患者(45%;第III组),不应期无变化(270±65毫秒对273±74毫秒),尽管心动过速不能被诱发。通过比较心动过速时和以心动过速周期长度进行心房起搏时慢径路上的A-H间期,研究快慢径路之间的捷径连接。消融前,第I组1例患者、第II组2例患者和第III组8例患者假定存在捷径连接。在消融后慢径路未受损的9例患者(第III组)中,8例患者存在捷径连接,而消融后慢径路受损的11例患者(第I组和第II组)中有8例快慢径路之间不存在捷径连接(P<0.05)。
在快慢径路之间存在捷径连接的患者中,无需损害慢径路传导本身即可消除AVNRT,而在没有这种捷径连接的患者中,必须损害慢径路传导。