Hart M
Department of Public Policy and Managerial Studies, De Montfort University, Leicester, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Dec;24(6):1234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb01030.x.
This paper reviews the ways in which quality measures have been defined by reference to objective measures and applied by the producers of health care to patients. Patient satisfaction surveys may be thought to redress this imbalance and will be addressed as a precursor to the discussion of the SERVQUAL methodology, developed to measure the gap between expectations and performance in service industries. An argument will be advanced that quality measurement is still producer-led and should incorporate the views of patients more directly into the quality measurement process. It is suggested that calibration or baseline surveys of patients be conducted which then identify the issues that may be subject to more sustained quantitative analysis. Quality monitoring should be conducted in such a way that particular sub-groups can be subject to routine analysis. Models of quality measurement need to incorporate the perspectives of many 'key players' in which the views of patients are complemented by relevant professional, clinical and managerial groups. The extent to which there is a disjunction between quality as objectively measured (e.g. by waiting times) and as experienced by patients will receive attention. Suggestions will be made that monitoring and clinic operations need to be more mutually reinforcing.
本文回顾了通过参考客观指标来定义质量衡量标准的方式,以及医疗服务提供者将其应用于患者的方式。患者满意度调查可能被认为可以纠正这种不平衡,并且将在讨论用于衡量服务业期望与绩效差距的SERVQUAL方法之前进行探讨。本文将提出一个观点,即质量衡量仍然以生产者为主导,应将患者的观点更直接地纳入质量衡量过程。建议对患者进行校准或基线调查,然后确定可能需要进行更持续定量分析的问题。质量监测应以能够对特定亚组进行常规分析的方式进行。质量衡量模型需要纳入许多“关键参与者”的观点,其中患者的观点由相关专业、临床和管理团队的观点加以补充。客观衡量的质量(例如通过等待时间)与患者体验的质量之间存在脱节的程度将受到关注。本文将提出建议,即监测与诊所运营需要更相互促进。