Cole D J, Baron P L
Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
Semin Oncol. 1996 Dec;23(6):719-24.
The appropriate role of elective hymph node dissection (ELND) in patients with clinical stage I intermediate thickness melanoma lesions remains a dilemma. Despite an impressive number of carefully performed nonrandomized/retrospective studies and two criticized multi-institutional prospective randomized trials, a clear benefit from ELND is still debatable. As a result, there currently is no standard approach for selecting patients who should undergo this procedure. Further prospective trials performed by the Intergroup/National Cancer Institute and World Health Organization (WHO) Melanoma groups, addressing Intermediate thickness extremity and truncal lesions respectively, have recently been completed. No long-term survival data is yet available from either group. Potentially conflicting preliminary results recently presented noted a significant ELND survival advantage for a subgroup of men with axial lesions in the Intergroup study, and no differential in survival demonstrable for the World Health Organization study at a median follow-up of 4 years. One area of agreement among surgeons on either side of the controversy is the need to be able to identify in a minimally invasive manner stage I-II melanoma patients with clinically occult lymph node metastases from the population at risk. Technologies such as polymerase chain reaction and lymphoscintigraphy to improve our ability to detect clinically occult lymph node metastases and facilitate the identification of sentinel node(s) for selective lymphadenectomy hold some promise. Although more research needs to be performed, these approaches potentially would allow for a more directed application of ELND in a much smaller number of melanoma patients. This could provide an entirely novel and more effective approach to the manner in which we evaluate patients with intermediate thickness melanoma lesions and would decrease the significance of this controversy. It is hoped that the long-term data about the appropriate role of ELND from the current prospective trials will provide definitive information on which to base decisions, or that current research will fundamentally alter our approach to these patients. In the interim, surgeons must continue to make their best judgments about the management of regional lymph nodes in an individual patient setting based on prior experience or personal bias.
对于临床I期中等厚度黑色素瘤病变患者,选择性淋巴结清扫术(ELND)的恰当作用仍存在争议。尽管有大量精心开展的非随机/回顾性研究以及两项备受批评的多机构前瞻性随机试验,但ELND的明显益处仍有争议。因此,目前尚无选择应接受该手术患者的标准方法。由肿瘤协作组/美国国立癌症研究所和世界卫生组织(WHO)黑色素瘤研究组分别针对中等厚度的四肢和躯干病变开展的进一步前瞻性试验最近已完成。两组均尚未获得长期生存数据。最近公布的潜在相互矛盾的初步结果表明,在肿瘤协作组研究中,患有轴向病变的男性亚组有显著的ELND生存优势,而在世界卫生组织的研究中,中位随访4年时未显示出生存差异。争议双方外科医生的一个共识领域是,需要能够以微创方式从高危人群中识别出患有临床隐匿性淋巴结转移的I-II期黑色素瘤患者。诸如聚合酶链反应和淋巴闪烁显像等技术有望提高我们检测临床隐匿性淋巴结转移的能力,并有助于识别前哨淋巴结以进行选择性淋巴结切除术。尽管还需要进行更多研究,但这些方法有可能使ELND更有针对性地应用于数量少得多的黑色素瘤患者。这可能为我们评估中等厚度黑色素瘤病变患者的方式提供一种全新且更有效的方法,并将减少这一争议的重要性。希望当前前瞻性试验中关于ELND恰当作用的长期数据将提供明确的决策依据信息,或者当前研究将从根本上改变我们对这些患者的治疗方法。在此期间,外科医生必须继续根据既往经验或个人偏好,对个体患者区域淋巴结的管理做出最佳判断。